-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
Originally Posted by
CleanIT
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I read a similar article to your wapo article in epoch times.
Not really sure what the chart here is telling us...as it gives trump 2 years in office and two prison sentences? Lol
Not to mention criminal convictions?
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
Originally Posted by
opie
I read a similar article to your wapo article in epoch times.
Not really sure what the chart here is telling us...as it gives trump 2 years in office and two prison sentences? Lol
Not to mention criminal convictions?
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Not to sound dumb....but what does this chart mean...lol
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
Originally Posted by
Bosko
Not to sound dumb....but what does this chart mean...lol
You dont sound dumb. That chart is a joke and made up with false numbers. Trump has NEVER been convicted of any crime
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
PolitiFact | Many more criminal indictments under Trump, Reagan and Nixon than under Obama, Clinton and Carter
I was curious myself bc I didn’t believe it.
"Unless an administration official is charged with a crime for acts while in office, it’s not always easy to identify which indictments can be connected to a presidential administration; some administration officials have been indicted for acts in the private sector, some indicted people were involved in presidential campaigns but didn’t work in the administration, etc.
This claim exaggerates the number of indictments under Trump, in particular, by counting the number of criminal charges filed, rather than the number of people indicted; and it includes the indictments of people who are not part of his administration, such as 25 Russians.
On the whole, however, the indictments under the three GOP presidents do dwarf those under the three Democrats. "
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
Ha! now it makes sense...it came from politifact.
Would you trust politifact knowing that it has ties to the bill and melinda gates foundation? I know i sure as hell dont.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: For those that are interested.
Originally Posted by
Bruno Soares
That's nuts. And this happens everywhere. My dad, who lives in Brazil (where I came from), is complaining daily about the fact that the president that won the election now was not wanted but somehow came up with just enough votes (won by just over 1% and in Brazil it's based on majority of votes count, not this electoral college crap). The election there is all digital, there are no paper ballots. But they think these guys managed to hack these machines and create votes. Some small cities had about 10 to 20% votes over their population. In the US I think it's way easier to inject fake votes in because the system is so archaic.
Quite the uprising happening in Brazil.
Powerful Demonstration of ‘We the People’ Happening Now in Brazil
-
Re: For those that are interested.
Originally Posted by
Bosko
2 gay men. That will do ANYTHING to stay where they are.
I'm not a hateful person but the rock is such a blatant phony he makes my blood boil.
Trash.
Bookmarks