autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21
    Regular Member JMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    North Bend, Washington
    Posts
    182
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Speak English... Or go back from wenst thee came!!

  2. #22
    Super Member greatwhitenorth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    B.C.
    Posts
    356
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Does every thread have to turn from a practical discussion to either;

    A.) A chemistry debate.
    B.) Advanced mathematics that in real world situations have minimal effect on the outcome. (Although I often measure my overlaps down to the .0005")
    C.) A deep observation of mankind's common tendency in any given situation to disprove A.) or B.)

  3. #23
    In time out
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    4,845
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Seriously though, i think we are all going a little "Small Pad Crazy" with 2" polishers and the like. They are fun to play with, but I have not seen much that I can't get with a 3" pad on 2 7/8" BP

    I would say using a pad with 40% more surface area escapes the realm of mathematical theory and becomes very applicable in the Real World of Polishing Paint

    I understand smaller pads 5-5 1/2" pads for a PC or a Ruoes to help keep rotation, but not on a Flex or GG6

  4. #24
    Super Member FUNX650's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    21,057
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhitenorth View Post
    Does every thread have to turn from a practical discussion to either;

    A.) A chemistry debate.
    B.) Advanced mathematics that in real world situations have minimal effect on the outcome. (Although I often measure my overlaps down to the .0005")
    C.) A deep observation of mankind's common tendency in any given situation to disprove A.) or B.)
    I can't wait to see how some of the threads that contain "practical discussions" over on Autopia.org translates, whenever they transition to their new-forum's-format!

    You're a member of autopiaforums.com, aren't you?


    Bob
    "Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no risk."
    ~Joaquin de Setanti

  5. #25
    Super Member greatwhitenorth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    B.C.
    Posts
    356
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Quote Originally Posted by FUNX725 View Post
    I can't wait to see how some of the threads that contain "practical discussions" over on Autopia.org translates, whenever they transition to their new-forum's-format!

    You're a member of autopiaforums.com, aren't you?


    Bob

    I'm not, just here on AG
    So I'm not privy to what goes on there.
    What size pads do you use most often bob?

  6. #26
    Super Member FUNX650's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    21,057
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhitenorth View Post
    What size pads do you use most often bob?
    Thanks for asking.

    •I take into consideration what type of buffing I plan on doing.
    -I can usually get by with pads in the 4"- 6" range just fine.
    -For smaller blemishes, I'll often spot-buff using 3"- 4" pads.
    -Since I don't spend a lot of time buffing on the sides of RVs/Boats:
    I don't use many 7"- 9" pads

    •In a nutshell; and, as my general rule-of-thumb:
    -I use the smallest pad possible, for the most control possible
    over the buffing process.


    Bob
    "Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no risk."
    ~Joaquin de Setanti

  7. #27
    Super Member aim4squirrels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    DFW Texas
    Posts
    1,078
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Downward pressure would be more distributed over a larger pad. You could pressure harder to make all things equal.

    Panel curvature would need to be taken into consideration as to whether or not the pad is truly more effective due to size.

    For any forced rotation machine, larger pads will have a greater cut on the outer edge of the pad as the edge of a 7" pad will be traveling much faster than a 5" pad, assuming the machine doesn't bog down.

  8. #28
    Super Member swanicyouth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limerick, PA
    Posts
    9,388
    Post Thanks / Like

    Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Quote Originally Posted by greatwhitenorth View Post
    Does every thread have to turn from a practical discussion to either;

    A.) A chemistry debate.
    B.) Advanced mathematics that in real world situations have minimal effect on the outcome. (Although I often measure my overlaps down to the .0005")
    C.) A deep observation of mankind's common tendency in any given situation to disprove A.) or B.)

    Yeah. It's getting old. It seems we have some experts here who know more about the products than the people who manufacturer and sell them. Of course, they easily see through the "marketing BS" - and prefer to look at their car on a molecular level, and possibly even a sub atomic level of quarks and leptons.

    Maybe we should go more zen. Does anyone know where the meridians and chakras are on an 01 Pathfinder? Are they near the solar plexus?

  9. #29
    In time out
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    4,845
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    I disagree with Bob

    "-I use the smallest pad possible, for the most control possible
    over the buffing process."


    I think lots of us waste a lot of time using small pads

    I am starting to use the largest pad that I can effectively maintain full surface contact with

    3" to 4" is +78%
    4" to 5 1/2" is +89%
    5 1/2 to 6 1/2 is. +40%


    A general rule that many of the "Pros" use is to.maintain 50% compression of the pad. This seems to work for me with cutting and polishing pads of all types (exception is MF pads)

  10. #30
    Super Member FUNX650's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    21,057
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Efficiency of 5" pads versus 5 1/2" pads

    Quote Originally Posted by allenk4 View Post
    I disagree with Bob

    "-I use the smallest pad possible, for the most control possible
    over the buffing process."


    I think lots of us waste a lot of time using small pads
    I don't have a problem with you disagreeing with my above rule-of-thumb without you knowing which size(s) the pad will be that I choose for the most control possible over a particular paint's buffing process.

    I let: "The Test Spot" be my guide for more than selection of liquids.

    Also:
    My rule-of-thumb, that determines the size(s) of pads I choose, might just include:
    Quote Originally Posted by allenk4 View Post
    the largest pad that I can effectively maintain full surface contact
    Which in turn may actually be the "smallest" pad that allows me to, once again: have the most control possible over the buffing process.

    Quote Originally Posted by allenk4 View Post
    A general rule that many of the "Pros" use is to maintain 50% compression of the pad.
    What is your source of this interesting tidbit of information?


    Bob
    "Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no risk."
    ~Joaquin de Setanti

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-05-2016, 11:26 PM
  2. Any downside to using 3"/3.5" backing plate & pads on 6" DA
    By dennis hiip in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-16-2014, 05:01 PM
  3. The Difference Between Facebook "Likes" versus "Talking About This"
    By OnsiteDetailing in forum How to make money detailing cars
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2013, 11:57 PM
  4. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-31-2011, 07:48 AM
  5. Trade 6.5" CCS pads for 6.5" LC Flat pads, anyone??
    By WRAPT C5Z06 in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-09-2010, 05:58 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234