Introducing: Duragloss Squeaky Clean

[SonOfOC]

Thanks Richy! I'm excited to see how SC will compare to P21 Paintwork Cleaner and Pinnacles Cleaning Lotion.

You mentioned pre-release of SC straight from Duragloss. Can you provide the link or send me a PM? I could not find it on DG webpage.

[richy]

Thanks Richy! I'm excited to see how SC will compare to P21 Paintwork Cleaner and Pinnacles Cleaning Lotion.

You mentioned pre-release of SC straight from Duragloss. Can you provide the link or send me a PM? I could not find it on DG webpage.

It's not on their site yet; you need to call.


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

[octane]

Didn't see anything on the duragloss site about them shipping to Canada?

[richy]

Didn't see anything on the duragloss site about them shipping to Canada?

No, but they will. Just MAKE SURE you tell them not to ship via UPS. UPS will rape you with border fees. USPS is the way to go shipping to Canada.

[octane]

No, but they will. Just MAKE SURE you tell them not to ship via UPS. UPS will rape you with border fees. USPS is the way to go shipping to Canada.

I contacted them, they said the product is still in testing and cannot be sold... and that they don't ship via USPS to Canada... doh!

[ihaveacamaro]

I have used Hyper Polish (not a huge fan of it compared to others) for the purpose of it being supposedly "coating ready". If I'm not mistaken, Chris still advised to do an ONR wipedown after HP and before coating. I certainly would not go from that to a coating without either an ERASER wipedown or ONR. Even with using HP, the SC will show you the true condition of the paint, and, it being a cleaner, you may be pleasently surprised at the little bump in appearance you get!

Just to share my experience, I've gone from hyper polish to damp MF wipedown (water) to OC with no issues. At around 8 months on my car via that method.

[richy]

Just to share my experience, I've gone from hyper polish to damp MF wipedown (water) to OC with no issues. At around 8 months on my car via that method.

Roshan, I don't doubt you, I just need to be sure as I'm selling this product and it would kill me time-wise to have to re-do one b/c it didn't bond properly. I can't take that risk. There's not a huge difference between ONR and water, but I feel better about using the ONR. Plus, with the lubricity of it, I know I won't get marring, even on soft paint. It's like an insurance policy.

[ihaveacamaro]

Roshan, I don't doubt you, I just need to be sure as I'm selling this product and it would kill me time-wise to have to re-do one b/c it didn't bond properly. I can't take that risk. There's not a huge difference between ONR and water, but I feel better about using the ONR. Plus, with the lubricity of it, I know I won't get marring, even on soft paint. It's like an insurance policy.

Richy, I totally understand where you're coming from, and I agree with your reasoning

[nubaseal]

Doesn't 601 does the same job of cleaning the paint and leaves nothing behind? It also helps all their sealants to bond better.

What additional benefit does SC bring to the table, considering DG doesn't even have a COATING in their range?

[richy]

Doesn't 601 does the same job of cleaning the paint and leaves nothing behind? It also helps all their sealants to bond better.

What additional benefit does SC bring to the table, considering DG doesn't even have a COATING in their range?

Had you read my opening post, you would have read that I had specifically requested that this product be made. With coatings becoming so popular, it seemed to be a no-brainer to bring it to market. 601 is not a cleaner on the level like 501 is. I wanted something strong like 501 but without a sealant aspect to it. DG doesn't need to have a coating to be able to make this product.