The Pan video...you know the one, discuss!

[Klasse Act]

I know some people here don't like him and for the sake of the thread let's leave that out It seems someone took it upon themselves to flush out what he makes a year and/or per sponsored vids, seems "gutter" at the very least

I was reading through the comments but at the very top was a link to another guy not liked too much here, Scott from DPC. He too made some interesting points.

It's a bottle of product, applied to a car and the reviewer either likes it or doesn't, some are tried and not even brought infront of the camera. Others have their OWN products made to their discerning tastes, it's all out there for us to decide what's best

What am I missing here....

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[PaulMys]

Gonna take a pass on this one, Rog.

I think I am among the crowd who has already stated my opinion on Pam.

[MisterSnoop]

I think I am among the crowd who has already stated my opinion on Pam.

[DETAILROOKIE]

Lmao

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[DUBL0WS6]

I've watched a few Pan videos. I always assumed he was an unbiased, independent consumer reviewer of the products. To later find out that he was a paid endorser of a product is IMO unethical on his part and on the part of the companies who are paying him. He should clearly state in his videos that he is being paid by such and such company to demonstrate their product.


I have nothing against Scott but find it odd that he feels he needs to defend Pan.

[Coatingsarecrack]

I've watched a few Pan videos. I always assumed he was an unbiased, independent consumer reviewer of the products. To later find out that he was a paid endorser of a product is IMO unethical on his part and on the part of the companies who are paying him. He should clearly state in his videos that he is being paid by such and such company to demonstrate their product.


I have nothing against Scott but find it odd that he feels he needs to defend Pan.

Pan does what is required by youtube on all his videos to state when a video is sponsored.

Alot of us made that assumption and thats how he probably started out. He doesn’t ever say he doesn’t do this for money and has actually come out before and said this is main source of revenue




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DUBL0WS6]

Pan does what is required by youtube on all his videos to state when a video is sponsored.

Alot of us made that assumption and thats how he probably started out. He doesn’t ever say he doesn’t do this for money and has actually come out before and said this is main source of revenue




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I never noticed that before. I don't remember it being on the videos that I watched previously. I guess that does change the situation some.

[dwaleke]

I never noticed that before. I don't remember it being on the videos that I watched previously. I guess that does change the situation some.

Seems that is result of him being called out. That was not on his videos previously.

[Daviddear30]

Seems that is result of him being called out. That was not on his videos previously.

Not accurate
It's there plus he says it and it's in description too. Most just don't pay attention to it

They have too to keep their YouTube perks in tact

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[MisterSnoop]

Seems that is result of him being called out. That was not on his videos previously.

Haven't watched many of his videos but I also did not notice that on a recent video I had watched prior to all this. I do see he also has it disclosed in the description. Could the videos have been updated to show that popup or did we just not notice?