I would rather have the PE-8 be smaller than just have another oscillating machine. For the most detailed correction, a rotary is obviously the only option where "surgical buffing" is needed.
Although this "surgical buffing" is really only needed on less than 10% or even 5% of cars, I'd rather have a a more refined PE-8. I wouldn't mind having a very small orbital (1-3mm orbit), but you can never be as precise as a rotary.
Former professional detailer. Current medical student (class of 2023)
Ive been in talks with a manufacturer and may have something in the works
Just have to actually pull the plunge to get started and will post a link on autopia as I'm not sure it'll be allowed on autogeek..but hey I can try as the link won't be for saleing it
Along with a somewhat ends all multiple need for polisher feature
Had the idea for over a year, just never looked into what it'd take till a couple months ago
What I like with the flex is the build quality and performance and that I'm not limited to pad choice.....by that I mean i'm not limited to this "using our pads = best balance, rotation etc.". That would mean altering my technique, trying new things and learning a new type of machine altogether. This is the only reason I did not get a rupes mini (apart from the 4" pads). The ibrid is convincing, but would never be as covincing as a flex with 3" pads.
I would love the pe8 flex kompakt and the access to pads as small as 1", but as a hobbyist, I don't think i am or will ever be comfortable buying a rotary.
Bookmarks