autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 59
  1. #31
    Super Member AutowerxDetailing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sherwood, Oregon
    Posts
    2,791
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by builthatch View Post
    this might be the best post you've made on here so far, haha.

    i agree. people will go through an intensive soup to nuts restoration...and their paint condition will be terrible. i see it ALL. THE. TIME. at shows...even higher level shows.
    I wish they made special glasses that would hide swirl marks so I could enjoy car shows like when I was a kid.
    Nicholas Scafidi - CQuartz Finest Authorized Installer
    www.autowerxdetailing.com Auto Detailing in Sherwood, OR
    Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter

  2. #32
    Super Member SeanChav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    434
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    even before I got into detailing hard core, I had enough common sense (which doesn't seem very common anymore) to not be wiping my car down with quick detail spray in the middle of the day with the sun blasting down on everything.... and don't get me started on the ppl that use the same MF towel on the whole car AND their wheels
    2010 Candy White Volkswagen CC - 170k and counting DD
    2006 DSOM C6 z06 - 22k miles

  3. #33
    Super Member parshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Lewis Center OH
    Posts
    626
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by choijw2 View Post
    I say iron X is optional but clay is must if you feel roughness on surface
    (taking about average daily driven cars)

    if you choose to do both, Iron X and then Clay.
    If you use Iron X, do you really need to clay? Doesn't seem there would be anything there for the clay to remove.

  4. #34
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    87
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by parshooter View Post
    If you use Iron X, do you really need to clay? Doesn't seem there would be anything there for the clay to remove.
    Iron X only removes ferrous (iron-containing) contaminants. "Claying" will remove non-ferrous contaminants bonded to the paint such as tar, sap, overspray, etc.

  5. #35
    Super Member roguegeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Alamo, CA. USA
    Posts
    380
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    This sounds like something I'd want to incorporate into my process, but the cost is something to consider. What are Iron X alternatives that are effective and safe on paint? I'm reading Meguiar's DUB Wheel Cleaner and some Sonax products. What else is available?

  6. #36
    Regular Member DasBurninator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    164
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by roguegeek View Post
    This sounds like something I'd want to incorporate into my process, but the cost is something to consider. What are Iron X alternatives that are effective and safe on paint? I'm reading Meguiar's DUB Wheel Cleaner and some Sonax products. What else is available?
    Adam's deep wheel cleaner is probably the best priced one. Performs well too. For paint decon use you can dilute it 1:1

    Don't let any of these type of products dry on the paint.

  7. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    53
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    I have a 2016 Charger SRT Metallic Grey on order. If the car ships with plastic, etc. to Kansas City do I really need to use IronX on the paint prior to claying? I plan a pre wash polish after claying and then BFWD. I can see ironX on the wheels perhaps but I don't want to perform steps that may not accomplish anything or be necessary.

    The past ten years I went through two silver MBs and had not heard of the ironX recommendation despite being on these forums. Those cars with claying and BFWD looked fabulous. I''m not arguing or saying it's not a good product, just wanting to be convinced, or not, that I really need this step on a metallic grey. Thanks.

  8. #38
    Regular Member Priyaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    159
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    Is it necessary? No. Is it advisable? Yes. You don't know how long the car may have been sitting around on a lot uncovered after it was manufactured before being shipped.

    Perhaps you may want to test a panel or two to see how much contamination there is to determine if it is worth chemically decontaminating the entire car?
    Yeah we all shine on, like the moon, and the stars, and the sun - John Lennon

  9. #39
    Super Member Paul A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    5,274
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    I would try it and see what, if any, bleeding you get. I think i read earlier in this thread that Mike P uses it much more frequently than i do and always gets reaction. I am of the opinion that i want it out of and off my paint. Especially my wife's car that's white. I don't want anything left behind that could potentially turn into a nice little rust dot on her otherwise perfectly white paint.

  10. #40
    Super Member FUNX650's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    21,057
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is Iron-X really necessary?

    •IronX, or its ilk, necessary?
    -Depends on numerous factors, IMO.
    -Each individual knows best: what man-made
    and environmental contaminates their
    vehicle(s) face...in the areas they reside.

    •But, let there be no doubt that, IMO: whenever
    an iron-contaminate remover/dissolver is used...
    it definitely becomes a necessity, and behooves an
    individual to apply an LSP to the paint—as it now
    contains/has "holes" in it—caused from where there
    once were iron-contaminates abiding.


    NOTE:
    By stating: "apply an LSP to the paint"...
    What I'm really saying is: 'ensure that the paint,
    from now on, always has upon it a film-layer
    of an LSP'!


    Bob
    "Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no risk."
    ~Joaquin de Setanti

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rusted Cast Iron / Iron X / Iron remover
    By Swift in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-19-2018, 09:23 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-04-2016, 02:41 PM
  3. Ok new Benz, time to Iron decon - Iron X spray or soap?
    By Marc Hufnagel in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-10-2013, 05:20 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-15-2013, 05:14 PM

Members who have read this thread: 1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234