Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
-
Regular Member
Re: Has anyone use D114
Just tried using D114 along with D156 for the first time and I have to say that I am seriously impressed!
Thanks for all the tips and advice given in this thread fellas, much appreciated!
15' Mazda6 GT w/ Tech
Snowflake Pearl / Black Leather Interior
-
Super Member
Re: Has anyone use D114
If you like those, D115 will amaze. Its a combination of both and frankly its off the charts.
In my day we didn't have the Internet, iPods,iPads, or smart phones....but we had some really bad-azz cars.
-
Re: Has anyone use D114
Originally Posted by silverfox
If you like those, D115 will amaze. Its a combination of both and frankly its off the charts.
+1
-
Re: Has anyone use D114
Problem with 115 is it's cost per use vs 114. Most like to top with something it seems in every thread anyways, or use drying aids or quick wax after words. Even detail juice is more cost effective than the ratio of 115
-
Re: Has anyone use D114
Originally Posted by MattPersman
Problem with 115 is it's cost per use vs 114. Most like to top with something it seems in every thread anyways, or use drying aids or quick wax after words. Even detail juice is more cost effective than the ratio of 115
this, i thought i misread the ratio on 115.... yikes.. more cost effective to clean with 114, then do a spraywax or something right after.
-
Super Member
Re: Has anyone use D114
At the ratio for D115 you'd only want to use it as a RW anyway. WW would be too expensive.
Always keep the shine in your life.
-
Super Member
Re: Has anyone use D114
Originally Posted by runrun411
At the ratio for D115 you'd only want to use it as a RW anyway. WW would be too expensive.
Am I understanding this post correctly? . Are you saying D115 would be less expensive to use as Rinseless Wash than it would be for a Waterless Wash?
-
Re: Has anyone use D114
Originally Posted by Real Riders
Am I understanding this post correctly? . Are you saying D115 would be less expensive to use as Rinseless Wash than it would be for a Waterless Wash?
I think he means use it like Meguiars wash and wax anywhere
-
Super Member
Re: Has anyone use D114
D114's a good deal, D115's WTH uber expensive compared to other rinseless with wax. 1 oz of ONR for 2 gallons of water. Unless my California public education failed me *he he he* the same 1oz with D115 makes 4oz of product. What am I missing here? Is this like the greatest product ever? I know not every product will have the same dilution, but an entire 1 gallon bottle to make 5 gallons seems insane. A gallon of ONR will make like 256 gallons of solution.
Now this isn't a knock on Meguiars, I own many of their products and a lot of them are great and a fantastic deal, I really don't understand D115 though.
-
Super Member
Re: Has anyone use D114
Originally Posted by Moldavite
I think he means use it like Meguiars wash and wax anywhere
Right. IMO D115 should be used as I saw on AG's web page. A couple of onces in a 5 gallon bucket or 4:1 in a 32oz spray bottle. That way the gallon will last a little longer.
Always keep the shine in your life.
Similar Threads
-
By PoorOwner in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 9
Last Post: 02-09-2016, 08:11 PM
-
By Supergus1 in forum Ask your detailing questions!
Replies: 11
Last Post: 08-18-2015, 07:46 PM
-
By MrOneEyedBoh in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 18
Last Post: 07-02-2015, 10:07 PM
-
By BTLew81 in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 13
Last Post: 12-11-2014, 01:43 PM
-
By BTLew81 in forum Product Reviews
Replies: 6
Last Post: 12-11-2014, 01:48 AM
Members who have read this thread: 1
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
Bookmarks