autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1. #1
    Super Member Kristopher1129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,861
    Post Thanks / Like

    Not too impressed with 105

    I don't know if it's just me or what. But, I've used 105 numerous times at this point. Other than the spread time window being really small...There's not too much to complain about. But honestly...I've got some compounds at my disposal that blow this stuff out of the water.

    Can I get good results with it? Yes. Do I have to use it multiple times to get those results? Yes. For some reason, I always have to do a second pass with 105. I think that's mainly due to it's lack of passes to be made. I have noticed though, that with the PC...it tends to spread better, and work better for that matter. But whenever I try to use a wool pad with my Makita...it just eats it up. I typically prime my pad with 205 to improve the spread time to avoid it turning to chalky dust before it has time to work.

    I've only had one bottle of 105 up to now. I'm just not so sure I would buy another one. I bought it cause it seems to be 90% of peoples "go to" compound in AG world. So I figured I'd give it a solid shot. I really think I've given this stuff a fair assessment. I just haven't been too impressed so far. Now 205...I absolutely LOVE. I think 205 is a far superior product than 105 IMO. I will surely have 205 in my arsenal from now on. But I think I'm breaking up with 105, ha.

    How do you guys use it? Any tricks?

  2. #2
    Super Member ScottB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    18,803
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    In general you need to find a polish line you like using and does what you expect. You will practice and become efficient on its use and abilities. 105 is a nice product, but certainly no crime to choose another line as desired.


    Scott

  3. #3
    Super Member silverfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,813
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    I think you should try either or both of the following combos:

    a) Megs Ultimate compound/Ultimate polish combo w/5.5" Lake Country hydro tech pads

    b) Megs MF DA system, D300/D301 (5" Megs MF pads)

    I think between the two, you ought to be able to find the sweet spot in terms of best bang for the buck.
    In my day we didn't have the Internet, iPods,iPads, or smart phones....but we had some really bad-azz cars.

  4. #4
    Super Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    ankeny ia
    Posts
    1,301
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    have you tried that with the new megs da pads yet?

  5. #5
    Super Member Kristopher1129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,861
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    Quote Originally Posted by silverfox View Post
    I think you should try either or both of the following combos:

    a) Megs Ultimate compound/Ultimate polish combo w/5.5" Lake Country hydro tech pads

    b) Megs MF DA system, D300/D301 (5" Megs MF pads)

    I think between the two, you ought to be able to find the sweet spot in terms of best bang for the buck.
    Interesting. I've been wanting to try the MF DA system really bad. I may have to give that a shot. Especially since I only seem to get results that please me with a rotary. Ultimate compound I've also been wanting to give a shot as well. Thanks.

  6. #6
    Super Member jamores23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    miami florida
    Posts
    974
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    i just made my order for the da mf system i have the old m105 thats for rotary only

  7. #7
    Super Member jamores23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    miami florida
    Posts
    974
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    kris what do you prefer in place of 105?

  8. #8
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like
    I like Meg's DA SMAT compounds and polishes. I REALLY like the new DA MF system! Although, if you're a rotary guy, moving to a DA might be awkward. What is your compound of choice, Kris?

    Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
    '03 Corvette Z06

  9. #9
    Super Member RaskyR1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Shakopee, MN
    Posts
    3,733
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristopher1129 View Post
    I don't know if it's just me or what. But, I've used 105 numerous times at this point. Other than the spread time window being really small...There's not too much to complain about. But honestly...I've got some compounds at my disposal that blow this stuff out of the water.

    Can I get good results with it? Yes. Do I have to use it multiple times to get those results? Yes. For some reason, I always have to do a second pass with 105. I think that's mainly due to it's lack of passes to be made. I have noticed though, that with the PC...it tends to spread better, and work better for that matter. But whenever I try to use a wool pad with my Makita...it just eats it up. I typically prime my pad with 205 to improve the spread time to avoid it turning to chalky dust before it has time to work.

    I've only had one bottle of 105 up to now. I'm just not so sure I would buy another one. I bought it cause it seems to be 90% of peoples "go to" compound in AG world. So I figured I'd give it a solid shot. I really think I've given this stuff a fair assessment. I just haven't been too impressed so far. Now 205...I absolutely LOVE. I think 205 is a far superior product than 105 IMO. I will surely have 205 in my arsenal from now on. But I think I'm breaking up with 105, ha.

    How do you guys use it? Any tricks?
    Have you tried M105 on fresh paint?

    What do you feel cuts better than M105? Does it finish down as well?


    I know 3M Extra Cut works faster, but it leaves the finish looking terrible....


    I would agree with what Killr said above though.
    Quote Originally Posted by CieraSL View Post
    Wait! I know! Mirror, mirror against the grass, tell me who has kicked swirls' ass?
    http://Raskysautodetailing.com/

  10. #10
    Super Member AeroCleanse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Neenah, WI
    Posts
    2,422
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Not too impressed with 105

    I gave up on M105 (back when it was rotary only). Right now I use GTechniq P1 and System 51 99% of the time. I like the fact they are water based.

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Very, VERY impressed!
    By sasson in forum Customer Comments
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-23-2013, 11:59 AM
  2. First purchase - I'm impressed
    By eyost in forum Customer Comments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-06-2012, 06:02 AM
  3. PDR - impressed!
    By pixelmonkey in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2011, 02:03 PM
  4. Wow! I am impressed!
    By DaGonz in forum Product Reviews
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-21-2011, 03:18 PM
  5. Not impressed!
    By Mark Stewart in forum Auto Detailing Tools and Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 05:51 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234