Please compare MOHS and CQuartz UK 3.0

[abqhudson]

Any advice would be appreciated.

It seems like the latest CQuartz goes on much easier than I remember. Maybe not as thick/durable as before??

Can anyone compare Gyeon MOHS with C Quartz UK?

Thanks.

[Coatingsarecrack]

I’ve only used 3.0 but easy on easy off got 1.5 years good performance before car wrecked. Would have expected 2-2.5 years


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[dgage]

This is like asking which is better, a Porsche or Ferrari, as they are both great. There will be more information/videos about UK 3.0 since it has been out several years longer. And just because MOHS is newer, doesn’t necessarily mean it’s better as UK 3.0 was the primary product/reason Gyeon redesigned they’re coatings.

[briarpatch]

I can only attest to MOHS.....it's been on my truck since November. It is my first coating, and I chose it because of its ease of application. Once cured, it was fairly slick and the truck looks great. I anticipate getting around 2 years out of it. on YouTube, Status Detail has some videos about it...very honest and informative

[Bruno Soares]

I have one on my car and the other on my wife’s car. For application I think Mohs Evo is superior, it’s faster to do being that it gets wiped off immediately, it’s also a single layer. UK 3.0 is recommended to get 2 layers and it gives you a couple of minutes before it can be wiped off. Although that makes it take longer to apply, it’s also less rushed and stressful. Mohs Evo is slicker than UK 3.0:by itself but if you top that with Gliss or Sic, then I’d say they are the same.

Beading is superior on UK 3.0. It also darkens the paint and gives it a richer look compared to Mohs.

So which would I use again? That all depends on how fast do I need it done. If I have the time, I’ll pick the CarPro option. If I want it done fast, Mohs Evo is pretty good.

[briarpatch]

I have one on my car and the other on my wife’s car. For application I think Mohs Evo is superior, it’s faster to do being that it gets wiped off immediately, it’s also a single layer. UK 3.0 is recommended to get 2 layers and it gives you a couple of minutes before it can be wiped off. Although that makes it take longer to apply, it’s also less rushed and stressful. Mohs Evo is slicker than UK 3.0:by itself but if you top that with Gliss or Sic, then I’d say they are the same.

Beading is superior on UK 3.0. It also darkens the paint and gives it a richer look compared to Mohs.

So which would I use again? That all depends on how fast do I need it done. If I have the time, I’ll pick the CarPro option. If I want it done fast, Mohs Evo is pretty good.

Interesting that you mentioned that 3.0 darkens the paint more than MOHS....on Esoteric's comparison between Pure EVO and MOHS EVO, they recommend Pure for the darkening effect. My Tundra that has MOHS on it.....is a darker color...and the results bear that out.

[Bruno Soares]

Interesting that you mentioned that 3.0 darkens the paint more than MOHS....on Esoteric's comparison between Pure EVO and MOHS EVO, they recommend Pure for the darkening effect. My Tundra that has MOHS on it.....is a darker color...and the results bear that out.

Yeah, Pure and UK have similar darkening effect. Mohs doesn't really do that, it just gives it a crisp look that isn't so deep. That's why they say it's a better choice for lighter colors and Pure for darker colors. But I guess either will look good, the prep is what gives most of the gloss. That huge pop from a fresh coating doesn't last that long if not topped regularly.

[Coatingsarecrack]

Darkening effect…. What does that do, if anything on white?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Rsurfer]

Darkening effect…. What does that do, if anything on white?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't you know..it darkens white.

[Coatingsarecrack]

Don't you know..it darkens white.

Sweet. Wanted grey in the first place


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk