Just to chime in,
You're thinking is logical. The idea sounds good on paper. The problem with substituting SANDING with CLAYING is
1: If the paint is HARD then removing 100% of the sanding marks will be difficult.
2: The sanding discs are expensive and wear-out quicker than we all like.
3: If there are a lot of tough contaminants on the surface of car paint and you do try to SAND them off instead of clay them off - you will load up and wear out your sanding paper or disc.
4: The most EFFECTIVE and time-efficient way to remove 100% of the sanding marks out of ALL body panels both flat and CURVED is with a rotary buffer.
(I'm throwing this #3 item, (which is very carefully worded), in here for all the guys that say a free spinning random orbital is just as fast and faster than a rotary for removing sanding marks. This might work in the middle of a flat panel but it won't work for the entire car so just break out the rotary and get it over with) :laughing:
That's off the top of my head. And you're getting this opinion from the guy that taught the
first PUBLIC class on damp sanding and I believe the ONLY guy that has an article on
damp sanding in the world.
I feel your pain.
I say an aggressive
clay
trumps rubber products all
day.
So go with what you know...
