Thanks: 0
Dislikes: 0
-
A question of claying and working backwards?
Any of these synthetic clay mitts, towels, real clay bars ect marr the living heck out of your paint. Is this really worth doing when your car is in great shape. All it does is make your paint worse. Is this not working backwards?
I know it's very superficial and comes out easy but still. I've use the finest bars and sponges. They still cause a great deal of marring. Especially if u do it quick after the decon wash.
If your car is properly maintained is it really picking up enough contamination to justify doing this? Now you're polishing step is going to get you back to where you were instead of somewhere more refined.
Thoughts?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
I find when I maintain my cars well, I get almost nothing off when I clay...so little that I wonder why I am bothering to do it. Now, last couple of years I've been pretty lax...I wouldn't be surprised if my clay results are different now...but I probably won't know that until spring.
-
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
Just depends on your vehicle and driving conditions. I sometimes find the lower rocker and fender well areas requiring a bit of claying or tar removal from time to time, the rest of my vehicle not so much.
-
Super Member
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
Originally Posted by MikeC78
Just depends on your vehicle and driving conditions. I sometimes find the lower rocker and fender well areas requiring a bit of claying or tar removal from time to time, the rest of my vehicle not so much.
Call me crazy, but I find that all vehicles have the least amount of contaminants below the belt line and absolutely no contaminants ever on the wheels.
Just a couple of days ago, I was doing a waterless wash for a friend of mine in order for him to slap a car cover on the car before it rained. The paint was heavily contaminated on the horizontal panels from sitting outside [its in the process of being restored and is prepped for paintjob]
Vertical panels you can feel a bit less contamination... But the moment you run your hand below the body line on the side of the car it’s absolutely smooth. This was a clear indication that contaminants mainly affected the top sides of vehicles, hence the term “fallout”.
I’ll stick to my guns. Lower portions of vehicles always have the least amount of contaminants and wheels have absolutely none. I challenge anyone to clay the face of their wheels after using a wheel cleaner and show contaminants on the claybar.
-
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
If you ever drive in places that use rock chip and tar, you'll see it much differently. I'm not saying my particular situation is the same as yours, and its mostly certainly dependent on many factor including your geographic location.
-
Super Member
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
Originally Posted by MikeC78
If you ever drive in places that use rock chip and tar, you'll see it much differently. I'm not saying my particular situation is the same as yours, and its mostly certainly dependent on many factor including your geographic location.
I will find tar down there. But as far as baggie test failing grit, it’s always noticeably less IME.
-
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
Originally Posted by Eldorado2k
Call me crazy, but I find that all vehicles have the least amount of contaminants below the belt line and absolutely no contaminants ever on the wheels.
In my experience the most contaminated areas of most cars are a feet long area right behind the wheel wells/fenders under the belt line, the hood and the top/roof of the car. Horizontal surfaces generally get more contaminated than vertical ones (and that's because most of the surface below the belt line is usually not that much contaminated), because solved or floating particles settle easier on them, and also because any and all protection (and also the clear coat) gets degraded faster on horizontal surfaces. The reason for the latter being is that rain drops and the incident rays of the sunlight reach them in a sharper angle and in a larger amount, than the vertical surfaces.
Wheels do not get really contaminated, because their surfaces are vertically aligned, the fender and the tire (which extends over the actual rim) prevents most - if not all - of the stuff hitting them head-on. And also because they're essentially constantly spinning, which in turn means that anything that gets them on will most likely get slung off immediately or shortly by the centrifugal and centripetal forces (with the only exception being probably the surface of the wheel cap).
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
My NanoSkin used to marr a lot too but once I stopped using ONR as lube and started using Glide things got so much better. I should have followed manufacture’s recommendation and would have had a better time with it from the beginning.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
Originally Posted by itsgn
Wheels do not get really contaminated, because their surfaces are vertically aligned, the fender and the tire (which extends over the actual rim) prevents most - if not all - of the stuff hitting them head-on. And also because they're essentially constantly spinning, which in turn means that anything that gets them on will most likely get slung off immediately or shortly by the centrifugal and centripetal forces (with the only exception being probably the surface of the wheel cap).
Tell that to Mercedes and BMW owners.
-
Super Member
Re: A question of claying and working backwards?
Originally Posted by Eldorado2k
Call me crazy, but I find that all vehicles have the least amount of contaminants below the belt line and absolutely no contaminants ever on the wheels.
Just a couple of days ago, I was doing a waterless wash for a friend of mine in order for him to slap a car cover on the car before it rained. The paint was heavily contaminated on the horizontal panels from sitting outside [its in the process of being restored and is prepped for paintjob]
Vertical panels you can feel a bit less contamination... But the moment you run your hand below the body line on the side of the car it’s absolutely smooth. This was a clear indication that contaminants mainly affected the top sides of vehicles, hence the term “fallout”.
I’ll stick to my guns. Lower portions of vehicles always have the least amount of contaminants and wheels have absolutely none. I challenge anyone to clay the face of their wheels after using a wheel cleaner and show contaminants on the claybar.
You ever drive a Caddy through a snow bank (end of the driveway), and then onto dirty salted roads?
I'm telling you, Eldo.... That crap does some serious clinging to the lower parts and wheels. It sucks.
Let's switch locations for the winter, Ric. It's was a balmy 17 degrees here this morning. LOL
That said, in warmer temps, I can totally see your point about horizontal vs. vertical. Just makes sense.
It is no coincidence that man's best friend cannot talk.
Similar Threads
-
By Aaryn NZ in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 27
Last Post: 08-02-2018, 03:12 PM
-
By mfrickman in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 10
Last Post: 05-29-2013, 05:34 AM
-
By Hades02 in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 3
Last Post: 04-08-2013, 07:20 AM
-
By Rez90 in forum Ask your detailing questions!
Replies: 3
Last Post: 03-23-2011, 10:36 AM
-
By muddy in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 6
Last Post: 08-21-2008, 05:53 PM
Members who have read this thread: 0
There are no members to list at the moment.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
Bookmarks