-
When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
So, when should a rubbing compound be used instead of a polish? What exactly is the difference between the two? Would my understanding be correct if I assume a rubbing compound is strictly for fixing a light to moderate oxidation? Where as a polish is limited to removing/minimizing scratches and providing gloss and shine.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
Big difference in the clarity of the last two pics. Like you said, bringing it back to perfection. What finishing polish and pad did you use?
Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
I would just think of a compound as an aggressive polish regardless of the type of defect you're trying to remove.
If the polish you are using isn't getting you the result you desire, or if it's taking too long to get the result you desire, then step up to a compound to remove the defect(s), followed by a polish for final finishing.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
Originally Posted by
cullen2505
Big difference in the clarity of the last two pics. Like you said, bringing it back to perfection. What finishing polish and pad did you use?
Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
That was HD Speed and I’m pretty sure I was using an Orange LC HD Orbital foam polishing pad.
-
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
Thanks for the reply. Looks great!
Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
Originally Posted by
cullen2505
Thanks for the reply. Looks great!
Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk
Thank you sir.
-
Super Member
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
Basically it's a depth of paint cut application for me. A compound is going to remove more paint than a polish. You want to get to the bottom of the scratches and defects to remove them. Compounds can get down there more effectively than polishes, generally speaking.
Because of the abrasives in compounds, many times they leave some minor marring themselves after being worked down. That's when a finer abrasive polish comes in and cleans everything up.
You want perfectly flat paint.
Sometimes the paint marring is relatively light and a milder polish will flatten the paint enough without cutting down too much with a compound.
Then there's different paint hardness/softness that forces the use of a compound or a polish. I've had Ford trucks that required aggressive products to level down mild to moderate defects along with a black Honda recently that was severely hacked up and a light polish took care of it.
Try different things and go from less aggressive to more aggressive to see what it takes. You'll get used to what works best in each situation and get a feel for workability.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Super Member
Re: When should a compound be used instead of a polish?
Whenever you tried a polish on your test spot and it didn't correct enough. Then you can try a more aggressive pad or a compound, or both, depends on how messed up the paint is.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Bookmarks