3D Graphene Ceramic Coating

opie said:
Crap my mistake, thanks for straighting me out man! I was thinking of their professional line. My wife was right i am always wrong haha

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

No worries, Opie!

I always do better heeding the advice of the better half.
 
I’m passing on the graphene craze and waiting for one to come out with Electrolyte’s……

It’s what paints crave!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Coatingsarecrack said:
I’m passing on the graphene craze and waiting for one to come out with Electrolyte’s……

It’s what paints crave!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I read a really interesting article on graphene and mining it etc. and it couldn't possibly do a whole bunch since it was like 1% or something like that. I tried to find it again and couldn't
 
Just to chime in...

I trust Tunch Goren as a chemist and also an honest man. I chose to leave the geek and join the 3D team because I honestly love their products and use them professionally when I detail client cars. To say I love their products is another way of saying I love their chemistry. The quality of any product comes down to the quality of the chemist plus their manufacturing ability.

As others in this thread have said, there are all kinds of products on the market now with the word graphene on the label. Heck, I think I've even seen graphene tire dressings? Really?

I've worked with the chemist at 303 that created the 303 Graphene Nano Spray Coating and drilled him on whether the Graphene in their product was functional or just marketing and he convinced me it was functional. (he also took one of my Roadshow Detailing Classes so I was able to spend quite a bit of time getting to know him).


After talking to two REAL chemists about what graphene is and what it takes to make it a functional ingredient, it is my opinion, and I'm happy to be proven wrong, that the majority of graphene products on the market are not functional graphene products. Just like back in the 1970s and 1980s when many companies jumped on the Teflon Bandwagon, (where are these products now?), there might be graphene in the marketed product, but like Teflon in all the products back in the day, it's simply not functional.


Racer's Edge Auto Polish Fortified with TEFLON

full




So I asked Tunch straight out, is the graphene in our new 3D Ceramic Coating Plus functional and he answered "yes".

At some point everyone can decide who to trust and who to doubt, but I trust Tunch. I've used this new coating on two cars so far and it’s as good and/or better than any ceramic coating I've used to date. How well it performs only time but again, I trust Tunch's chemistry ability and over the decades he's proven himself to be an honest person in our industry.



Here's my first two 3D graphene coated cars....


1949 Pontiac Road Chief Streetrod - 3D Ceramic Coating Plus - Graphene Infused

full



1966 Chevrolet Corvair Corsa Turbo 4-Speed - 3D Ceramic Coating Plus - Graphene Infused

full




Mike Phillips
 
Mike Phillips said:
the Teflon Bandwagon, (where are these products now?)



Mike Phillips
Click to expand...

Because it's banned in the United States


When was Teflon Banned in the USA?
2014
Beginning in 2003, its use was gradually phased out in the United States under an agreement between government and industry, and eliminated by 2014
 
Mike Phillips said:
Just to chime in...

I trust Tunch Goren as a chemist and also an honest man. I chose to leave the geek and join the 3D team because I honestly love their products and use them professionally when I detail client cars. To say I love their products is another way of saying I love their chemistry. The quality of any product comes down to the quality of the chemist plus their manufacturing ability.

As others in this thread have said, there are all kinds of products on the market now with the word graphene on the label. Heck, I think I've even seen graphene tire dressings? Really?

I've worked with the chemist at 303 that created the 303 Graphene Nano Spray Coating and drilled him on whether the Graphene in their product was functional or just marketing and he convinced me it was functional. (he also took one of my Roadshow Detailing Classes so I was able to spend quite a bit of time getting to know him).


After talking to two REAL chemists about what graphene is and what it takes to make it a functional ingredient, it is my opinion, and I'm happy to be proven wrong, that the majority of graphene products on the market are not functional graphene products. Just like back in the 1970s and 1980s when many companies jumped on the Teflon Bandwagon, (where are these products now?), there might be graphene in the marketed product, but like Teflon in all the products back in the day, it's simply not functional.


Racer's Edge Auto Polish Fortified with TEFLON

full




So I asked Tunch straight out, is the graphene in our new 3D Ceramic Coating Plus functional and he answered "yes".

At some point everyone can decide who to trust and who to doubt, but I trust Tunch. I've used this new coating on two cars so far and it’s as good and/or better than any ceramic coating I've used to date. How well it performs only time but again, I trust Tunch's chemistry ability and over the decades he's proven himself to be an honest person in our industry.



Here's my first two 3D graphene coated cars....


1949 Pontiac Road Chief Streetrod - 3D Ceramic Coating Plus - Graphene Infused

full



1966 Chevrolet Corvair Corsa Turbo 4-Speed - 3D Ceramic Coating Plus - Graphene Infused

full




Mike Phillips
Click to expand...


Will respond later to this nonsense.
 
Bosko said:
Because it's banned in the United States


When was Teflon Banned in the USA?
2014
Beginning in 2003, its use was gradually phased out in the United States under an agreement between government and industry, and eliminated by 2014
Click to expand...

And it probably wasn't because it didn't work but more about environmental concerns and patents running out. Same deal with R12 and 134A, replace it with a more expensive, more hazardous, less effective chemical.
 
I’ve been using 3D coating on customer vehicles and have had great customer satisfaction.

I’ve become loyal to 3D over the years because their marketing is honest and their products work. Made in USA. I’ve never bought a product of theirs and felt it was snake oil. I may one day get the new coating, but for now I’ll stick with the original. I like it’s shorter flash time. Keeps me focused and moving quickly.

3DSpeed and 3DOne are my go to products. Phenomenal results with both.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
chilly said:
Nope, I’m not gonna buy that

It’s not gluten free, non GMO, free range, and organic

Frankly, I’m offended

TRIGGER WARNING!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Shame. Free express shipping to Alaska.
 
Mike what makes the graphene functional other than Tunch saying yes. I’d like to know what makes it functional. There are other brands that have changed their graphene formula and the technology that goes into them.


Flash Gordon said:
Would be even better without him. Shouldn't be much longer now. Tunch will figure this guy out like everyone else that he's work for
Click to expand...

Dang what’s your beef with Mike? Did he do you wrong? It’s not the first time I read a post of yours attacking his character.
 
DUBL0WS6 said:
And it probably wasn't because it didn't work but more about environmental concerns and patents running out. Same deal with R12 and 134A, replace it with a more expensive, more hazardous, less effective chemical.
Click to expand...

caused birth defects in children....they say


Other unrelated studies have also found evidence of birth defects in babies from PFOA-exposed workers. In 1981, two out of seven women who worked at a DuPont Teflon plant gave birth to babies with birth defects. DuPont then moved 50 women workers at the plant to reduce their exposure to PFOA.


Teflon contains a compound known as C8, which is harmful to both your health and the environment. According to a large body of research, C8 disrupts normal hormone function and lowers testosterone levels in men. It has also been linked to various cancers and birth defects




Does DuPont still use C8?
The lawsuits had alleged that DuPont knew C8 was dangerous, but failed to keep it from poisoning the water supply. After DuPont agreed to stop using C8, it replaced it with GenX, which is a similar compound.Sep 13, 2017


substances banned by FDA, in an order that takes effect immediately , are perfluorinated compounds or PFCs, a class that includes the chemicals used to make DuPont's Teflon and 3M's Scotchgard.Jan 4, 2016
 
Bosko said:
substances banned by FDA, in an order that takes effect immediately , are perfluorinated compounds or PFCs, a class that includes the chemicals used to make DuPont's Teflon and 3M's Scotchgard.Jan 4, 2016
Click to expand...

Scotchgaurd?....son of a biitch i used that chit 2 years ago

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top