autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 7 of 26 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 259
  1. #61
    Mike Phillips
    Guest

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post

    Mike Phillips - hi Mike, did you experience the same poor pad rotation in free spin mode during your initial review?

    Thanks,
    ScottH

    Yes. I found it difficult to maintain pad rotation in the free-spin mode. I've only buffed out the 1971 Duster with this tool and that's all I've had time for as we've had a lot of video projects in the garage in the last two weeks and more this week.


    Here's what used this tool for on the Duster and the mode and the order I did the processes

    Machine sanding with Mirka Abralon #3000 = Gear driven mode

    Machine sanding with Mirka Abralon #4000 = Free spin mode



    Comment: You shouldn't sand with the Makita PO5000C in the gear driven mode because it's too aggressive. I broke the rule because I felt lucky. I explain why you shouldn't use the Makita PO5000C to machine sand in the gear driven mode in my article on this topic with the FLEX 3401 here - dated February 14th, 2013


    Can the Flex 3401 be used to wetsand?


    I coined the term scalloping after the experience and strongly recommend against using a FLEX 3401 to machine sand clearcoat paints. I








    In my boat detailing how-to book I do recommend using the FLEX 3401 for machine sanding gel-coats and aluminum but that's because these two materials are MUCH THICKER than clearcoat paints and they degrade to much worse condition. See the sections on restoring boats in category #4 and restoring aluminum pontoon boats.


    Paperback book - How To Detail Boats With Marine 31 by Mike Phillips







    Continued....


    Here's what used this tool for on the Duster and the mode


    Machine compounding to remove the #4000 grit sanding marks - Gear Driven Mode

    Machine polishing to refine the results from the compounding step - Gear Driven Mode

    Machine waxing to seal the paint after sanding, compounding and polishing = Free Spin Mode



    I tested a lot of pads as shown in my initial review in the gear-driven mode and found that the Makita PO5000C will turn and churn just about any 5.5" foam or microfiber pads. I did not test larger pads in the gear driven mode. For the free spinning mode all I tested was the 5.5" Lake Country CCS pads and I did have difficulty maintaining pad rotation. This is why I did the compounding and polishing steps in gear-driven mode and used the free spinning mode to machine apply the wax as you don't need pad rotation to machine apply a wax.


    I'll need to spend some more time behind the tool to find out more about it's abilities and limitations as well as test out other pad options to see which pad types work best and which don't.




  2. #62
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Not sure what the heck was thinking with the random orbit mode; it's super smooth, but maintaining pad rotation is worthless. Gear driven mode was beastly and very smooth(with the right pads). Didn't have a car to really test it's correction ability, but I have a feeling it'll be a monster!

    Mike, did you use MF pads for the compounding stage?
    '03 Corvette Z06

  3. #63
    Mike Phillips
    Guest

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by WRAPT C5Z06 View Post

    Mike, did you use MF pads for the compounding stage?

    Kind of... I tested out RUES, Buff & Shine and LC microfiber pads on the new Makita tool when I compounded the 1971 Duster but anything I used microfiber on I re-compounded with foam as fibers are form of abrasive and I saw micro-marring in my results.

    For the record, foam cutting pads with this tool were more than enough to pull out #4000 grit sanding marks using SONAX CutMax. I would say the paint was in the medium range from soft/medium/hard.



  4. #64
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Phillips View Post
    Kind of... I tested out RUES, Buff & Shine and LC microfiber pads on the new Makita tool when I compounded the 1971 Duster but anything I used microfiber on I re-compounded with foam as fibers are form of abrasive and I saw micro-marring in my results.

    For the record, foam cutting pads with this tool were more than enough to pull out #4000 grit sanding marks using SONAX CutMax. I would say the paint was in the medium range from soft/medium/hard.


    Thanks!

    What foam pads did you use to compound?
    '03 Corvette Z06

  5. #65
    Super Member ScottH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Thanks Mike for your insights. This morning I noticed the backing plate does not spin freely (by hand) when in free spin mode. This got me thinking - could this be solved with a washer installed? I have one washer on each of my GG6's, G15 and 7424. Granted they spin more freely out of the box (without a washer) than the 5000 does, but now then spin VERY easily - and I am sure this helps maintain pad rotation.

    Mike I know you took the 5000 apart - does it support a washer mod or is this not possible due to being gear driven?

    Thanks,
    ScottH

  6. #66
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post
    Thanks Mike for your insights. This morning I noticed the backing plate does not spin freely (by hand) when in free spin mode. This got me thinking - could this be solved with a washer installed? I have one washer on each of my GG6's, G15 and 7424. Granted they spin more freely out of the box (without a washer) than the 5000 does, but now then spin VERY easily - and I am sure this helps maintain pad rotation.

    Mike I know you took the 5000 apart - does it support a washer mod or is this not possible due to being gear driven?

    Thanks,
    ScottH
    The washer presents a bit of spacing on the 15mm & 21mm, so the backing plate does not rub the shroud, allowing it to spin freely. On the Makita, the backing plate does not rub the shroud, so I don't see where this would help.

    FWIW, if I'm correct, Mike has NEVER advocated using a washer in any polisher.
    '03 Corvette Z06

  7. #67
    Super Member ScottH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Thanks Wrapt. I didn't have a close look at the backing plate-shroud spacing this am but trust your eval. Wow I have to say then I am extremely disappointed with Makita if the expected behavior is no rotation under only the machine's own weight at speeds under 4 on a perfectly flat surface. How did this get to production after so many years of testing? Certainly we weren't the only ones to notice. OK so I have a nice gear driven machine and that is really how I intend to use it since I have 5 other free spinning machines. However that won't be the case for people looking to have one machine that does both. I can't for the life of me think this is normal. I'll reach out to Makita to see if I am overlooking something. Will let you know what they say.

    ScottH

  8. #68
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    116
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Why does it matter if the pad spins in random orbital mode? How much energy is really being generated, and where does that energy come from?



    RSW

  9. #69
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post
    Thanks Wrapt. I didn't have a close look at the backing plate-shroud spacing this am but trust your eval. Wow I have to say then I am extremely disappointed with Makita if the expected behavior is no rotation under only the machine's own weight at speeds under 4 on a perfectly flat surface. How did this get to production after so many years of testing? Certainly we weren't the only ones to notice. OK so I have a nice gear driven machine and that is really how I intend to use it since I have 5 other free spinning machines. However that won't be the case for people looking to have one machine that does both. I can't for the life of me think this is normal. I'll reach out to Makita to see if I am overlooking something. Will let you know what they say.

    ScottH
    No problem, Scott.

    I think the lack of rotation in free spin is very normal with this machine, unfortunately. Every demo I've seen, it stalled very easily in free spin. I was hoping I was wrong when I got my hand on it, but I wasn't. Good point about those who think they're getting a great gear driven AND free spin. Gear driven - YES, free spin - NO

    FWIW, I can't wait to give this machine a run in gear driven mode on heavily swirled paint. I think it will correct VERY WELL!!
    '03 Corvette Z06

  10. #70
    Mike Phillips
    Guest

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by WRAPT C5Z06 View Post

    Thanks!

    What foam pads did you use to compound?

    About 99.99999% of the time I document all my work and take pictures and share pictures from my projects. I did this for this project. The issue however is I didn't have the time to process ALL the pictures and share them in this thread,

    Review: Makita PO5000C Orbital Polisher - Gear-driven and Free Spinning - Mike Phillips


    Today and this week I'll be processing a LOT of pictures for a lot of new product reviews and when I do I'll get to the pictures showing all the pads I used and share them here and created a dedicated thread as I'm sure inquiring minds want to know...

    So stay tuned...



    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post

    Thanks Mike for your insights. This morning I noticed the backing plate does not spin freely (by hand) when in free spin mode. This got me thinking - could this be solved with a washer installed? I have one washer on each of my GG6's, G15 and 7424. Granted they spin more freely out of the box (without a washer) than the 5000 does, but now then spin VERY easily - and I am sure this helps maintain pad rotation.

    Mike I know you took the 5000 apart - does it support a washer mod or is this not possible due to being gear driven?

    Thanks,
    ScottH

    Two comments...


    1: Because the backing plate design and attachment design is identical to RUPES my guess is "yes" you could do the Kevin Brown Washer Mod to the Makita PO5000C polisher.


    From the above review I posted a LOT of pictures here's two...



    Note the spindle is slotted...





    The backing plate is also slotted so when re-attaching the backing plate be sure to align the backing plate so it fits flush against the spindle.








    2: Unlike the RUPES polishers, the rubber shroud does NOT come into contact with the back of the backing plate to cause drag.


    In my opinion, spacing the backing plate further away from the spindle would not have the same effect the Kevin Brown Washer Mod has on RUPES tools because there is no drag to start with. The Kevin Brown Washer Mod was to space the backing plate away from the spindle on RUPES tools to prevent the rubber shroud from making contact with the backing plate and thus causing drag against the backing plate.


    Just for you - some pictures showing the air gap between the shroud and the backing plate on the Makita PO5000C







    The lack of 100% no-drag spin of the backing plate in free-spin mode is probably just tight clearances and quality bearings.




Page 7 of 26 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-25-2019, 05:52 AM
  2. Rupes Mille or Flex 3401
    By Trevine in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 03-15-2019, 04:04 PM
  3. Rupes Mille vs 3401 - UPDATED Thoughts
    By TTQ B4U in forum RUPES BigFoot Oribital Polishers
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 10-22-2018, 08:26 PM
  4. Flex XC3401, Rupes Mille, or Makita
    By minirips2 in forum Ask your detailing questions!
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-16-2018, 09:36 AM
  5. Makita PO5000C vs Rupes Mille vs Flex 3401 specs
    By Mike@ShineStruck in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-23-2017, 02:47 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234