autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The "OC"
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rupes Mark II , Mark ii NICE!

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@AutoCleanse View Post
    Why you say the backing plates don't fit from version 1 to version 2. Do you mean thread size, thickness of plates or something totally different. Thanks in advance.
    Yes size of slot is different. Thickness is also different. Weight is identical down to the gram!
    (Mark I top, Mark II bottom)

    There is vast amounts of knowledge at your fingertips, use Google, Youtube, and the search button.

  2. #12
    Super Member Chris@AutoCleanse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    St. Cloud, Florida
    Posts
    1,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rupes Mark II , Mark ii NICE!

    Thanks for the info buddy. ^^^^^^^^^

  3. #13
    Super Member Bunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Posts
    6,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rupes Mark II , Mark ii NICE!

    If they only had a trade up program.....
    Al
    The Need to Bead

  4. #14
    Super Member Todd@RUPES's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Orlando/Oviedo
    Posts
    409
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rupes Mark II , Mark ii NICE!

    Quote Originally Posted by SonOfOC View Post
    Yes size of slot is different. Thickness is also different. Weight is identical down to the gram!
    (Mark I top, Mark II bottom)

    While I won't comment with 100% certainty...

    The later ES (legacy, MkI) models had an enlarged tab which required a larger slot in the backing plate. The backing plates are backwards compatible (you can use a newer backing plate on an older model but you cannot use an older backing plate on a newer model).

    The MK II backing plates that I have (pre-production) bolt up to the MK I, no problem. However, the earlier MK I backing plates (small slot) will not bolt up to the later MK I nor the MK II.

    Also, the MK II backing plate features identical lateral or sheer strength, but significantly vertical or peel strength.

    It is important to maintain lateral strength to keep the pad firmly seated on the machine and to reduce (significantly) movement loss (increase power). It took a lot of research to develop the hook on the MK II backing plate to maintain this while making the peel strength less.

    The result is both the pads and backing plate will last longer as the hooks will not get straightened nor will the loops get pulled apart. Win Win

  5. #15
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    PGH, PA
    Posts
    1,482
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rupes Mark II , Mark ii NICE!

    How does the Mark 2 compare to the boss regarding stalling

    I constantly kept reading about how the mark1 stalled on panels which is why i ended up with the boss.
    My boss hasnt stalled on me yet, and im new to machine polishing .
    So obviously the bigger watt motor compensated for the stalling issue... but it does generate allot of heat wbich i feel will comprimise the pads longterm durability. .

    IF you also cured the stalling issues with your more efficient motor while retaining same wattage i then think you guys took the better route
    as you will generate less heat then the boss while potentionaly producing less heat then the mark 1..

    Thoughts?

  6. #16
    Super Member Mp0wer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    228
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rupes Mark II , Mark ii NICE!

    Quote Originally Posted by Todd@RUPES View Post
    While I won't comment with 100% certainty...

    The MK II backing plates that I have (pre-production) bolt up to the MK I, no problem. However, the earlier MK I backing plates (small slot) will not bolt up to the later MK I nor the MK II.
    Todd will this backing plate fit on the Mark ll 21?

    Rupes LHR 15ES 5 Inch Backing Plate

    I understand it's not recommended, but I'm looking to use the 5" backing plate on the 21 Mark ll
    2015 Audi //S4 (Ibis White)
    1995 BMW ///M3 (Alpine White)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. RUPES Giveaway! Autographed RUPES 21 Mark II Up For Grabs!
    By Nick McKees37 in forum Car Care Product Giveaways
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 09-14-2016, 03:13 PM
  2. Rupes 15 Mark ll or Rupes 21 Mark ll?
    By Elger in forum RUPES BigFoot Oribital Polishers
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-06-2016, 09:16 PM
  3. Recommended pads for Rupes mark ll and Rupes mini
    By Elger in forum Wool & Foam Buffing Pads
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-21-2016, 09:32 AM
  4. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-21-2016, 07:46 AM
  5. Rupes LHR 21 Mark II =>VS LHR 15 Mark II Which one to get?
    By alegend in forum RUPES BigFoot Oribital Polishers
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-15-2016, 08:21 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234