Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
-
Junior Member
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
Originally Posted by mwoywod
FG400 is a great 1-step compound but for me I do alot of wet-sanding/orange peel removal and SHC300 is WAY better than PG1000 at removing sanding marks quickly and even though it will never finish down like FG400, it cuts dramatically more and what's great about it is that no matter how significant the haze is that is left behind, I've always been able to jump straight to the finishing polish step (HD Polish+ or Scholl's S30+)
Hello, can this wet sanding removal job done with a DA 600watt polisher? Or i need rotary to do that? Because i cannot get any GG or PC here in Indonesia
Cheers!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Super Member
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
HCC 400 continues to blow me away for both cut AND finish. PG 1000 reminded me of the older Menz Power Gloss stuff and never gave me the finish that HCC 400 does now.
Yes, it is now possible to effectively level paint after wetsanding with a DA machine, the right abrasive product and the right pads.
-
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
Originally Posted by mwoywod
FG400 is a great 1-step compound but for me I do alot of wet-sanding/orange peel removal and SHC300 is WAY better than PG1000 at removing sanding marks quickly and even though it will never finish down like FG400, it cuts dramatically more and what's great about it is that no matter how significant the haze is that is left behind, I've always been able to jump straight to the finishing polish step (HD Polish+ or Scholl's S30+)
What polishers have you used with SHC300?
-
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
PG1000 is the older Menz Power Gloss. Surprised they still making it now. I have a bottle with about 26 oz still in it.
-
Super Member
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
Ahhh, thanks DBailey. I thought it seemed interestingly familiar. Funny you mention how much you have left cus I haven't used mine since 400 came out and probably have about the same left too.
-
Junior Member
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
Originally Posted by Paul A.
HCC 400 continues to blow me away for both cut AND finish. PG 1000 reminded me of the older Menz Power Gloss stuff and never gave me the finish that HCC 400 does now.
Yes, it is now possible to effectively level paint after wetsanding with a DA machine, the right abrasive product and the right pads.
So how about SHC 300 is it the same? Because the chart says that HCC 300 give more cut than the HCC 400, do i need to have SF 3500 after the HCC 400?
So can we consider HCC 400 as an AIO product?
Thanks so much for your answer, sorry for too much asking
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Junior Member
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
Originally Posted by DBAILEY
PG1000 is the older Menz Power Gloss. Surprised they still making it now. I have a bottle with about 26 oz still in it.
Yes you're right, they still have it here in Indonesia, and i've bought a pack of 4: PG1000, SF2500, PP ultra, and metal polish cream
Just hoping that i can have good results on these products
Cheers!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
PG1000, imho, is more rotary oriented, rock in a bottle type of product.
After 300 came out, the 1000 became redundant, since the finishing is worse than the 300.
I never tried the new 1000 version, but the old one that I have is used primarily as a safer alternative before having to wetsand it.
The main use I have for the 1000 is to act as a 'leveler', a pre-cut stage, when the 400 is not enough to eliminate the deep swirls, years of neglect and hack detailer's job.
-
Junior Member
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
Originally Posted by RPM_BR
PG1000, imho, is more rotary oriented, rock in a bottle type of product.
After 300 came out, the 1000 became redundant, since the finishing is worse than the 300.
I never tried the new 1000 version, but the old one that I have is used primarily as a safer alternative before having to wetsand it.
The main use I have for the 1000 is to act as a 'leveler', a pre-cut stage, when the 400 is not enough to eliminate the deep swirls, years of neglect and hack detailer's job.
Hei thx for your answer! So PG1000 is not working well with the DA polisher? And what's the difference between the 300 and the 400?
Cheers!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: Question about Menzerna HCC300 vs PG1000 combination
300 has more cut, but less finish.
Similar Threads
-
By RPM_BR in forum Products Guides
Replies: 5
Last Post: 11-20-2014, 08:01 PM
-
By Faris63 in forum Ask your detailing questions!
Replies: 22
Last Post: 03-30-2014, 02:00 AM
-
By Crazycoward in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 3
Last Post: 04-20-2013, 09:05 AM
-
By adrynalinjunkie in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 11
Last Post: 01-12-2013, 11:46 AM
-
By Whitethunder46 in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 19
Last Post: 10-05-2007, 03:34 PM
Members who have read this thread: 0
There are no members to list at the moment.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
Bookmarks