autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 49
  1. #1
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    12,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Well Geeks I had a bit of time the other day to bring along my pair of FLEX’s for a side by side comparison. I wanted to see how these two machines would operate and handle next to each other as well as check the level of correction each one had to offer. For this test comparison everything was kept identical with the only variance being the tool itself.

    The darkest vehicle I could get my hands on was a dark blue metallic Chevrolet van. I cleaned up the test panel and taped it off for some side by side work. The left side was done completely with the PE14 and the right side only the 3401. The correction and polishing step was exactly the same. For correction I used an orange 6.5” Hybrid pad, FG400, and speed 3. For polishing work I used the 6.5” white Hybrid pad, SF4000, and speed 5. Again both sections received the exact same treatment with the only difference being the tool itself. The “Smack Technique” was utilized on both machines.

    As for the performance between the two machines side by side utilizing the same products, they were quite similar in that both did a tremendous job at removing the swirls in the paint with the PE14 achieving 10% more correction due to it being a rotary. Both machines finished down extremely well with no discernible difference on this hard GM paint.
    As for correction times I did not keep official track of them with a clock. I kept everything the same and the 3401 had no problems keeping up the PE14 due to its forced rotation nature. Both sections were completed in roughly the same time.

    When both sections were completed they each received an Eraser wipe down and when I pulled the tape off the entire section received another Eraser wipe down. My LSP of choice was Pinnacle Synergy applied by hand to top off my efforts. All pictures were shot with my Nikon D3200, standard 18-55mm lens with hood, and my Nikon SB-700 speed light with diffuser were the flash was used.
    For some more reading on the “Smack Technique”


    http://www.autogeekonline.net/forum/auto-detailing-university/77155-my-technique-concerning-3401-menzerna-products-hybrid-pads.html
    http://www.autogeekonline.net/forum/auto-detailing-university/80973-utilizing-smack-technique-pe14.html


    The van used for the test.


    The panel being used















    Taped off ready for the comparision





    First up, PE14 on the left



    And the 3401 on the right



    Next up is the polishing step.



    Now to check my results






  2. #2
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    12,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401






















  3. #3
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    12,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    And all the afters




































  4. #4
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    12,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    I hope you guys enjoyed this write up and undertaking as well as I did. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have.

    Mike

  5. #5
    Junior Member Denis Ware's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Long island, New York
    Posts
    58
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Great Job. This is what l was looking for in review in both machines because l have the Flex Pe-14 I think works outstanding (good review)

  6. #6
    Super Member HUMP DIESEL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Gaffney, SC
    Posts
    930
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Proof positive that a rotary when used correctly can achieve tremendous results. The Menz products don't hurt the equation either.

  7. #7
    Super Member Paul A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    5,274
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Thank you, smack. Outstanding comparison and display of both machines.

  8. #8
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    12,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Quote Originally Posted by Denis Ware View Post
    Great Job. This is what l was looking for in review in both machines because l have the Flex Pe-14 I think works outstanding (good review)
    Thank you sir!

    Glad you enjoyed the read.

    Quote Originally Posted by HUMP DIESEL View Post
    Proof positive that a rotary when used correctly can achieve tremendous results. The Menz products don't hurt the equation either.
    Thanks for the kind compliments Diesel!

    Quote Originally Posted by Puckman View Post
    Thank you, smack. Outstanding comparison and display of both machines.
    Thank you sir!

  9. #9
    Super Member FrankS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,560
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Nice comparison Mike and great pictures. Did you use speed 3 on the PE14 & 3401 for the correction step? Did you also use speed 5 on the PE14 for the polishing step or did you keep it a speed 3?

  10. #10
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    12,365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A FLEX comparision: PE14 vs 3401

    Quote Originally Posted by FrankS View Post
    Nice comparison Mike and great pictures. Did you use speed 3 on the PE14 & 3401 for the correction step? Did you also use speed 5 on the PE14 for the polishing step or did you keep it a speed 3?
    Thanks Frank!

    Everything was performed exactly the same on both machines. Speed 3 for correction and speed 5 for polishing.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DVD - How To Use the Flex 3401 & PE14 Rotary Buffer
    By Mike Phillips in forum How to articles
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-21-2015, 12:08 AM
  2. FLEX 3401 or PE14-2
    By NY-Bondo in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-24-2013, 05:56 PM
  3. Time to step it up, PE14-2 or 3401?
    By veeko in forum Ask your detailing questions!
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-16-2012, 02:22 AM
  4. FLEX XC 3401, FLEX L3403, or FLEX PE14-2-150 for Gel Coat
    By MichaelD in forum Boat & Marine Craft Detailing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-16-2012, 01:28 AM
  5. PE14-2 or 3401
    By SDS97_7.3 in forum Flex Polishers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-17-2011, 11:29 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234