Clay/nanoskin then seal/wax or clay/nanoskin, Polish, seal/wax? (Nanoshock question)
Just looking for Input from all of you if you can. Please share your thoughts and experiences with this process and what one you feel comfortable with.
From personal experience when I started detailing for money I would use my nanoskin fine mitt and seal for majority of jobs. One day I did a vehicle and experienced some marring and thought that I should at least polish to remove that before returning it to the customer. I came on and asked what to do and got some awesome answers that lead me to change the package to include a light polishing step to remove the marring anytime I clay or mechanically decon.
What I'm asking now is that I was looking at Nanoshock and if I could use this as a clay and seal package for my business. Anyone use this as a decon and wax package? If so have you experienced any marring that led you to polish after.
Re: Clay/nanoskin then seal/wax or clay/nanoskin, Polish, seal/wax? (Nanoshock question)
Or should I just keep the package with the decon Polish and sealant? Mainly looking to see if the Nanoshock can give me a different package for my customers.
Re: Clay/nanoskin then seal/wax or clay/nanoskin, Polish, seal/wax? (Nanoshock question)
Whenever I do a wash/wax (people don't want to pay for a polish here) I automatically clay first it just enhances the look and the customer doesn't realize what I've done
Steve
-The Titanic Was Built By Professionals But The Ark By Amateurs-
Bookmarks