autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    47
    Post Thanks / Like

    Question about Megs pads

    Hi Folks,

    Quick question here. Last pads I used on my porter cable were the Megs soft buff W8006 type 6.5" diameter. I am thinking of getting the newer low profile megs pads in 5" diameter and wonder if this is a sound idea? I gather these pads are more efficient.

    Also, I noted that the backing plates for the 5" pads are well, 5". I always used to use a 4.75" plate with my 6.5" pads. Will this new combo be alright to use?

    Thank you all for the advice, I really appreciate it!

    Bobby

  2. #2
    Super Member 2black1s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Simi Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,783
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    The Meg's 5" Soft Buff pads (DFC5, DFP5, and DFF5) are actually about 5 1/2" diameter. They will work fine with a 5" backing plate.

    The pads have a 5" velcro backing and the foam has a radius that extends out from there resulting in the 5 1/2" overall diameter.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    47
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    Quote Originally Posted by 2black1s View Post
    The Meg's 5" Soft Buff pads (DFC5, DFP5, and DFF5) are actually about 5 1/2" diameter. They will work fine with a 5" backing plate.

    The pads have a 5" velcro backing and the foam has a radius that extends out from there resulting in the 5 1/2" overall diameter.
    Thank you for the reply! I really appreciate it.

  4. #4
    Super Member luckydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,117
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    I like going with the thinner pads for paint correction using the PC

  5. Likes Paul A. liked this post
  6. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    47
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    Quote Originally Posted by luckydawg View Post
    I like going with the thinner pads for paint correction using the PC
    Thank you. It seems that pads are trending towards thinner for more efficiency etc...from what I am seeing. Appreciate the reply!

  7. #6
    Super Member JustJesus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Orange & LA Counties
    Posts
    1,294
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    And the Megs MF Discs are good, too.

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  8. #7
    Super Member Paul A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    5,274
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    5" pads will work fine with a 4.75" BP.

    And, as 2Black said...5.5" even better, 'specially with thin foam pads.

    I'd also agree with thinner pads.

  9. #8
    Super Member PaulMys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Eastern L.I. NY
    Posts
    10,773
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    The standard rhetoric on the PC is "not enough power".

    I disagree. The PC is a capable machine.

    I prefer to think of it as: Other machines have more power.

    That said, any advantage you can supply the PC with (Like a smaller rotational load with the 5 1/2" pads) will be an advantage.
    It is no coincidence that man's best friend cannot talk.

  10. #9
    Super Member luckydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,117
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulMys View Post
    The standard rhetoric on the PC is "not enough power".

    I disagree. The PC is a capable machine.

    I prefer to think of it as: Other machines have more power.

    That said, any advantage you can supply the PC with (Like a smaller rotational load with the 5 1/2" pads) will be an advantage.
    +1

  11. #10
    Super Member luckydawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,117
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Question about Megs pads

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul A. View Post
    5" pads will work fine with a 4.75" BP.

    And, as 2Black said...5.5" even better, 'specially with thin foam pads.

    I'd also agree with thinner pads.

    +1 here also

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Megs Pads vs. Lake Country Thin Pro Pads?
    By willowcat11 in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-31-2017, 08:33 PM
  2. Review: Rupes 21 and B&S MF pads vs Megs MF pads
    By Success in forum Product Reviews
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-11-2013, 03:20 PM
  3. megs mf pads
    By jamores23 in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-18-2011, 08:15 AM
  4. Megs MF pads and 105/205
    By jbrown287 in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-17-2011, 03:31 PM
  5. stupid question regarding pads and megs twins
    By NiSyam in forum Ask your detailing questions!
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 09:08 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234