Dislikes: 0
-
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Keep in mind, the 3401 will turn larger 6.5 pads without issue. Depending on what you are polishing, stick with the larger pads. If you encounter a lot of smaller vehicles you may way to go with the 5.5" pads.
-
Super Member
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
There's reason #2...forced rotation = option of bigger pad.
-
Newbie Member
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
I actually debated if I should get a flex 3401 and wound up getting the Rupes Mille and have no regrets. I still have my porter cable but just don't use it anymore.
-
Super Member
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Originally Posted by Mike@DedicatedPerfection
Keep in mind, the 3401 will turn larger 6.5 pads without issue. Depending on what you are polishing, stick with the larger pads. If you encounter a lot of smaller vehicles you may way to go with the 5.5" pads.
Yes it will. I have 4, 5, and 6.5" pads for mine.
-
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Forced driven DA's will not finish as well as random orbitals, especially on soft black paint.
-
Super Member
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Originally Posted by WRAPT C5Z06
Forced driven DA's will not finish as well as random orbitals, especially on soft black paint.
I respectfully disagree. Using the right pads, right products, and time behind the tool, a detailer can get a quality finish with a 3401 (or Rupes Melle). It's not the tools, it's the tool using it. LOL
-
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Originally Posted by Spikey Mike
I respectfully disagree. Using the right pads, right products, and time behind the tool, a detailer can get a quality finish with a 3401 (or Rupes Melle). It's not the tools, it's the tool using it. LOL
Depends on your definition of a quality finish. A random orbital will definitely finish better on softer paint systems. This is a fact.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Here are my .02 for what ever they are worth. I started with a PC, got a Flex immediately after. I detailed on the side for 10 years, and picked up a few long throws over the years. Then i sold my Flex just as I started doing this full time. I regretted it instantly. Why, like Mike says, you can plow through a car faster. Most of what I do are one step paint corrections, and the few multisteps I have done, a forced rotation would have made the cutting step quicker and more effective. But when doing a one step a Flex will get you more cut in a shorter amount of time
-
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Originally Posted by WRAPT C5Z06
Forced driven DA's will not finish as well as random orbitals, especially on soft black paint.
I agree with this from experience except I would not make an exception for the color of the paint. I would phrase it like this,
All other factors kept the same, generally speaking, any brand of free spinning random orbital polisher will finish out nicer more consistently on soft paints as compared to any brand of gear-driven non-random orbital polisher.
And I'll take a guess I have the oldest documented post on this observation in the second part of my reply in post #34 in the below thread.
In post #33 I was asked,
Originally Posted by Crazy Amos
What made you decide to finish out with the G110 vs the Flex? Pad size selection or the non forced rotation maybe?
For those that might not know - the Meguiar's G110 polisher is a 8mm free spinning random orbital polisher. It was a copy of the Porter Cable, which is a 8mm free spinning random orbital polisher.
My answer in post #34
Originally Posted by Mike Phillips
Good question...
I find on softer paints like this car has that the PC style with a Fine Cut Polish finishes out nicer than with the more powerful Flex 3401.
The paint on this car was incredibly soft.
When I wrote the PC "style" the context was any free spinning random orbital polishers.
Here's the link to the full write-up dated December 23rd, 2013
Christmas Detail - Ferrari P4 - Move over Rudolf
This is why I used free spinning random orbital polishers on this car.
Original BASECOAT/CLEARCOAT paint - 1996 Porsche 993
If this wasn't the case, I would have used the BEAST.
What if?
If the BEAST or Supa BEAST or CBEAST or RUPES Mille or Makita PO5000C is all you have, then for your last polishing step uses your softest foam pad and your best fine cut or ultra fine cut polish and reduce any downward pressure for the last 2-3 section passes and you get the job done.
-
Re: Should I upgrade to a Flex 3401?
Black paint makes hazing more noticeable, hence, why I mentioned the color.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Similar Threads
-
By DETAILROOKIE in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 36
Last Post: 05-25-2017, 10:49 AM
-
By Gkern21 in forum Ask your detailing questions!
Replies: 6
Last Post: 05-01-2017, 08:11 AM
-
By lonye in forum Flex Polishers
Replies: 13
Last Post: 08-29-2015, 12:30 AM
-
By UglyBetty in forum Auto Detailing 101
Replies: 9
Last Post: 10-17-2013, 05:20 AM
-
By MichaelD in forum Boat & Marine Craft Detailing
Replies: 1
Last Post: 10-16-2012, 01:28 AM
Members who have read this thread: 0
There are no members to list at the moment.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
Bookmarks