autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 8 of 26 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 259
  1. #71
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Cool, thanks!
    '03 Corvette Z06

  2. #72
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by RSW View Post
    Why does it matter if the pad spins in random orbital mode? How much energy is really being generated, and where does that energy come from?



    RSW
    With such a small stroke, I would think it's imperative to have adequate pad rotation in free spin to get any type of correction. If the pad just jiggles, what good would that due?
    '03 Corvette Z06

  3. #73
    Super Member ScottH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by RSW View Post
    Why does it matter if the pad spins in random orbital mode? How much energy is really being generated, and where does that energy come from?



    RSW
    All else equal, more spin translates to more defect correction - at least in the hundreds of cars I've corrected. If the pad is only oscillating and not spinning, it's not doing as much correction as it could/would with a spinning pad.

    ScottH

  4. #74
    Mike Phillips
    Guest

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by RSW View Post

    Why does it matter if the pad spins in random orbital mode? How much energy is really being generated, and where does that energy come from?


    RSW
    Without pad rotation there's little to zero paint removal i.e. no correction.



    Quote Originally Posted by WRAPT C5Z06 View Post

    With such a small stroke, I would think it's imperative to have adequate pad rotation in free spin to get any type of correction.

    Without pad rotation there's little to zero paint removal i.e. no correction.


    Quote Originally Posted by WRAPT C5Z06 View Post

    If the pad just jiggles, what good would that due?
    I've seen respected gurus in the blogosphere argue that you can get correction with oscillation only. I've never seen anyone put their money where their mouth is and prove it but I've seen people talk the talk.




    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post

    If the pad is only oscillating and not spinning, it's not doing as much correction as it could/would with a spinning pad.

    ScottH

    That's always been my rant and point.

    In order to remove defects you must remove paint. Removing defects isn't actually removing the defect it's removing the paint surrounding the defect so as to level the surface and thus make the defect or the void in the paint visually disappear.

    When it comes to free spinning orbital polishers, the pad MUST rotate and oscillate in order to remove paint at any measurable amount to make the process effective otherwise you're just wasting time.



  5. #75
    Mike Phillips
    Guest

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Blast from the past...

    From 2010


    Swirls and Scratches Don't Exist


    Technically, you don't remove swirls and scratches because they don't exist, they are voids in the paint. You see, swirls and scratches have no physical substance or material, they are the visual appearance of missing paint.

    In order to restore a flawless, swirl and defect free finish you need to gently, and in a controlled manner, remove a little paint off the surface which has a leveling-effect. You don't actually remove swirls and scratches, you remove the paint surrounding swirls and scratches.


    Same thing goes for Type II Water Spots. You don't remove Type II Water Spots, your remove the paint surrounding Type II Water Spots.




  6. #76
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Phillips View Post
    Without pad rotation there's little to zero paint removal i.e. no correction.






    Without pad rotation there's little to zero paint removal i.e. no correction.




    I've seen respected gurus in the blogosphere argue that you can get correction with oscillation only. I've never seen anyone put their money where their mouth is and prove it but I've seen people talk the talk.







    That's always been my rant and point.

    In order to remove defects you must remove paint. Removing defects isn't actually removing the defect it's removing the paint surrounding the defect so as to level the surface and thus make the defect or the void in the paint visually disappear.

    When it comes to free spinning orbital polishers, the pad MUST rotate and oscillate in order to remove paint at any measurable amount to make the process effective otherwise you're just wasting time.


    '03 Corvette Z06

  7. #77
    Super Member Joe@NextLevelDetail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    1,929
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Phillips View Post
    Blast from the past...

    From 2010


    Swirls and Scratches Don't Exist


    Technically, you don't remove swirls and scratches because they don't exist, they are voids in the paint. You see, swirls and scratches have no physical substance or material, they are the visual appearance of missing paint.

    In order to restore a flawless, swirl and defect free finish you need to gently, and in a controlled manner, remove a little paint off the surface which has a leveling-effect. You don't actually remove swirls and scratches, you remove the paint surrounding swirls and scratches.


    Same thing goes for Type II Water Spots. You don't remove Type II Water Spots, your remove the paint surrounding Type II Water Spots.



    This is poetry.

    What a excellent way to describe what really is going on. That is something I admire about your writing skills.

  8. #78
    Super Member ScottH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Guys I spoke to a really nice guy at Makita USA (Georgia I believe) named Tony. I described the lackluster rotation we are seeing in free spin mode. I also encouraged him and the Product Developer to take one out of the box and replicate what we are seeing. I also told them they could call me at any time for more info, and offered to make a video demonstrating our observations. I will do that later today. So at the very least they are now aware that the random orbit mode is falling short of expectations. This motor has roughly the same power as the GG6 and BOSSG15/21, so at the very least I would expect free-spin rotation to be equal to those - and it's not even close.

    Will keep you all posted,
    Scott

  9. #79
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post
    Guys I spoke to a really nice guy at Makita USA (Georgia I believe) named Tony. I described the lackluster rotation we are seeing in free spin mode. I also encouraged him and the Product Developer to take one out of the box and replicate what we are seeing. I also told them they could call me at any time for more info, and offered to make a video demonstrating our observations. I will do that later today. So at the very least they are now aware that the random orbit mode is falling short of expectations. This motor has roughly the same power as the GG6 and BOSSG15/21, so at the very least I would expect free-spin rotation to be equal to those - and it's not even close.

    Will keep you all posted,
    Scott
    Good stuff, Scott.
    '03 Corvette Z06

  10. #80
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    PGH, PA
    Posts
    1,482
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Flex 3401 vs. Rupes Mille/Makita P5000C, for those that are wondering.

    i messaged them too the other day
    and it is possible to get correction with no rotation...with at least a 21mm and on a 08 dodge ram ..but you also have to massage the pad across the area it stalled multiple times...making it slower then just attacking from top to bottom

Page 8 of 26 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161718 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-25-2019, 05:52 AM
  2. Rupes Mille or Flex 3401
    By Trevine in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 03-15-2019, 04:04 PM
  3. Rupes Mille vs 3401 - UPDATED Thoughts
    By TTQ B4U in forum RUPES BigFoot Oribital Polishers
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 10-22-2018, 08:26 PM
  4. Flex XC3401, Rupes Mille, or Makita
    By minirips2 in forum Ask your detailing questions!
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-16-2018, 09:36 AM
  5. Makita PO5000C vs Rupes Mille vs Flex 3401 specs
    By Mike@ShineStruck in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-23-2017, 02:47 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234