Re: BOSS pads vs B&S Low Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WRAPT C5Z06
I wouldn't use the BnS Low Pros on a long throw. Funny thing is, they're not really low profile. I think they're GREAT on the 3401, however.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nothingface5384
Ive been using the 6.5 lowpros on both my G21 and 3401 with stock plate
@nothingface. So you wouldn't agree with the above statement by WRAPT?
Sent from my iPhone
Re: BOSS pads vs B&S Low Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eldorado2k
@nothingface. So you wouldn't agree with the above statement by WRAPT?
Sent from my iPhone
first part of his statement..no, second part yes
they cut and finish well, just stiffer then the boss...i'll take a lil stiffer pad for more pad durability. they're also cheaper
Re: BOSS pads vs B&S Low Pro
The BnS Low Pro pads are thicker overall, but the actual foam part is the same thickness as the BOSS pads. The added thickness is the neoprene foam part. That is pretty stiff and I don't think it is absorbing the movement of the pad at all like everyone is assuming happens with something like a LC CCS pad that actually has the thick foam.
I really like both of these pads. I don't even consider buying RUPES pads anymore.
I have not given the LC ThinPro pads a try yet. That is a pad that looks truly universal regards to working well on all the polishers.
Re: BOSS pads vs B&S Low Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by
58LesPaul
Where are you all seeing these for $7.99? AG has them for $12.99
Autogeek isn't the only place that sells detailing supplies.
Re: BOSS pads vs B&S Low Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by
conman1395
Autogeek isn't the only place that sells detailing supplies.
I'm well aware of that
Sent from my iPhone using Autogeekonline mobile app