Huge time saver!!!

[WRAPT C5Z06]

For the longest time, I've used a GG 6" and and 5.5" pads. For the past couple months, I've switched to the Flex 3401 and. 6.5" pads(4" too). Obviously, the 3401 can correct faster, but I attribute a lot of the time savings to the larger 6.5" pad. It covers so much more surface area, thus, you can work in larger sections. 6.5" pads + Flex 3401 ###!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk (http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1)

[Quiksilver5882]

The Flex is a great machine. Between that and my PC I feel no need to try out the Rupes.

[Mike@DedicatedPerfection]

For the longest time, I've used a GG 6" and and 5.5" pads. For the past couple months, I've switched to the Flex 3401 and. 6.5" pads(4" too). Obviously, the 3401 can correct faster, but I attribute a lot of the time savings to the larger 6.5" pad. It covers so much more surface area, thus, you can work in larger sections. 6.5" pads + Flex 3401 ###!!!

Glad to hear you are having great success with the Flex Mark. When equipped with the larger 6.5 pads combined with the forced rotation you can really correct and cover a lot of area fast.

[Mike@DedicatedPerfection]

Have you tried any of the hybrid pads on the Flex Mark?

[FrankS]

Glad to hear you are having great success with the Flex Mark. When equipped with the larger 6.5 pads combined with the forced rotation you can really correct and cover a lot of area fast.

:iagree:

[WRAPT C5Z06]

When equipped with the larger 6.5 pads combined with the forced rotation you can really correct and cover a lot of area fast.
:iagree:



Have you tried any of the hybrid pads on the Flex Mark?
I have. I do not like using the 5" at all with the Flex 3401. Too small to tackle most of a car. The 6.5" Hybrid's are good, but I like using 6.5" CCS pads better.

[Hoytman]

Mark, have you tried a rotary yet? Why am I thinking you were wanting to try a rotary? Hmmmnn...perhaps I am thinking of someone else.

[allenk4]

A 6.5" pad has almost 40% more surface area than a 5.5" pad

[Mike@DedicatedPerfection]

I have. I do not like using the 5" at all with the Flex 3401. Too small to tackle most of a car. The 6.5" Hybrid's are good, but I like using 6.5" CCS pads better.

:xyxthumbs:

[FUNX650]

Hi Mark...

For even more time savings:
Try CCS 7.5" foam pads on the 3401.

:)

Bob

[WRAPT C5Z06]

Mark, have you tried a rotary yet? Why am I thinking you were wanting to try a rotary? Hmmmnn...perhaps I am thinking of someone else.
Bill, I really have no desire to work with holograms. :dblthumb2:



A 6.5" pad has almost 40% more surface area than a 5.5" pad
Makes sense because of how much faster you can work.

[Just02896]

Hi Mark...

For even more time savings:
Try CCS 7.5" foam pads on the 3401.

:)

Bob

I wonder if using the larger pads would dictate more frequent brush failure? At least in a production type setting?

[Mike@DedicatedPerfection]

Mark, which polishes are you using with your 3401?

[DARK HORSE]

Damn Mark, I swear you get better looking every year! You are one good looking devil man!

[WRAPT C5Z06]

Damn Mark, I swear you get better looking every year! You are one good looking devil man!

Eh, I'm ok. You're better looking, Tad. :props:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk (http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1)