PDA

View Full Version : My review of the Flex 3401 and Rupes Bigfoot polishers



Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

Harry Da Hamster
10-18-2013, 05:31 PM
I've had the chance to try both recently, the Flex 3401 and Rupes Bigfoot 15, and i just wanted to pass on my opinion and findings to those who may be in the market for a higher end orbital polisher. I rented the Flex 3401 and loved it compared to the GG and PC i tried. But decided to buy the Rupes 15 with no first hand experience based on all the hype. For all intents and purposes, the Rupes 15 and 21 are virtually the same. In a perfect world, the Rupes 15 and 21 smash the Flex 3401. The Rupes has a giant 15 or 21mm throw, and its non-direct drive meaning it would be virtually impossible to burn paint. Where as the Flex 3401 has a standard 8mm throw but is direct drive so the user can apply heavy pressure. Theoretically a non-direct drive long throw polisher would be all that we need for what were trying to accomplish. When polishing you shouldn't have to apply heavy pressure to the point where the Rupes would stall and the long throw would allow the polishes and compounds to work better as it abrades the surface with its long throw.

BUT in the real world we have various makes and models of cars of all different shapes. Curvacious vehicles like my new Cayenne have large sweeping concave panels throughout the vehicle on the lower half of the doors, on the D pillar, and above the headlights. This makes it virtually impossible to polish using a non-direct drive long throw polisher, a la Rupes 15 and 21. Even with the Kevin Brown washer mod, which essentially gives the polisher more power. In a concave panel situation, the long throw and non-direct drive work against each other and prevent the Rupes from orbiting.

Convex panels are a little better but still not as good as the Flex 3401. I noticed i didn't have the same stalling problem on the convex panels as i did with concave panels unless i used too much pressure. But the problem here is while using very little pressure, the contact patch of the foam pad against the panel is very small. Opposed to the Flex where i can use more pressure and buff out a larger area of the curved panel.

After trying to buff only a few panels of my Cayenne with the Rupes 15, i sold it and i'm considering a used Flex. So if you have one, message me!

Hope this review helps others to make a more informed buying decision.

Picture below to give you an idea where i had a difficult time polishing. Lower half of the doors, on the D pillar, and above the headlights.

http://zclee.com/random/cayenne.jpg

hernandez.art13
10-18-2013, 05:41 PM
Thanks for the review, so you picked the Flex, overall?

Harry Da Hamster
10-18-2013, 05:50 PM
If you're like me and you only want one machine for all polishing duties, i would highly recommend the Flex and that's what i choose. If you have the budget for multiple polishers, the Rupes Bigfoot should be in your arsenal.

Vegas Transplant
10-18-2013, 06:05 PM
Well said. Unbiased review.
Thanks for sharing this tool's limitations.
Often times we are so caught up in the hype, that we miss these snippets of info.

VISITOR
10-18-2013, 06:19 PM
while the rupes 15/21 have a larger throw, the flex spins several hundred more times per OPM and with forced rotation so wouldn't that make up for the larger throw? i'm curious to here everyone's opinion...

KillaCam
10-18-2013, 08:13 PM
Wish you would've compared the 21mm to the flex instead of the 15. A difference in a 6mm throw is a lot.

freddie46
10-18-2013, 08:40 PM
Nice ride! I use a GG in my business and it's easy to stall it out with even the slightest pressure. The bottom line is I get good results. Interesting info on the Flex. I might have to try one.

Gsrjake
10-18-2013, 10:19 PM
Yeah I would say the flex and the 21 would be more of an even review but what you're saying basically is that the flex is easier on those more awkward panels then the rupes? Thanks for taking your time and writing the review though I think I'm still gonna go with the 21 instead of the flex

Kaban
10-18-2013, 10:43 PM
Yeah I would say the flex and the 21 would be more of an even review but what you're saying basically is that the flex is easier on those more awkward panels then the rupes? Thanks for taking your time and writing the review though I think I'm still gonna go with the 21 instead of the flex

From what I have heard, the Rupes pad stops spinning on weird angles. I guess it's ideal on flat panels, but like OP said, the world is not ideal and a good chunk of the panels will not be flat. Flex, I don't care how much you abuse it, will not stop rotating so you know you are getting the full correction without needing to adjust the angle of the machine/pad or go easy on the pressure which obviously will be detrimental to its correction ability.

If money is no an issue, obviously it would be ideal to buy/try all of them to see what works best for you and your needs.

swanicyouth
10-18-2013, 11:08 PM
Thanks for the review and your thoughts on the machines.

I don't understand how people have issues with machines that "stop spinning". Yeah it can happen for a second, you just adjust you technique a bit. Maybe its because I learned on an old school anemic 7424 with 6.5" pads. I don't know, but I never really seen this as an issue.

My Rupes seems to spin faster/more torque when you put a bit of pressure on it. I've never had it "stop spinning" or really even slow down.

Harry Da Hamster
10-18-2013, 11:27 PM
Thanks for the comments fellas. I would love to have both but i'm only a weekend warrior and my budget does not call for it especially if i will only be polishing once every 3 months max.

KillaCam. I think the additional 6mm throw would make me favor the Flex even more. The problem is the non-direct drive and long throw on a compound concave panels. If using super light pressure, only the outer edge of the pad will touch the surface. Apply any pressure and it stalls.

Gsrjake. That is correct, sir.

Swanic. Maybe i'll post a profile picture of the concave curves of the vehicle. And what makes it worse is its a compound curve. Perhaps it was user error? It was impossible for me to make it work.

hernandez.art13
10-18-2013, 11:27 PM
Thanks for the review and your thoughts on the machines.

I don't understand how people have issues with machines that "stop spinning". Yeah it can happen for a second, you just adjust you technique a bit. Maybe its because I learned on an old school anemic 7424 with 6.5" pads. I don't know, but I never really seen this as an issue.

My Rupes seems to spin faster/more torque when you put a bit of pressure on it. I've never had it "stop spinning" or really even slow down.

I'm with you on this one Swanic, from the times I've used the Rupes. You have to really attempt to make it stop spinning for it to actually stop spinning.

The Rupes, has a lot of power from the times I have used it.

Gsrjake
10-18-2013, 11:31 PM
From what I have heard, the Rupes pad stops spinning on weird angles. I guess it's ideal on flat panels, but like OP said, the world is not ideal and a good chunk of the panels will not be flat. Flex, I don't care how much you abuse it, will not stop rotating so you know you are getting the full correction without needing to adjust the angle of the machine/pad or go easy on the pressure which obviously will be detrimental to its correction ability.

If money is no an issue, obviously it would be ideal to buy/try all of them to see what works best for you and your needs.
gotcha, thanks for the info

Thanks for the review and your thoughts on the machines.

I don't understand how people have issues with machines that "stop spinning". Yeah it can happen for a second, you just adjust you technique a bit. Maybe its because I learned on an old school anemic 7424 with 6.5" pads. I don't know, but I never really seen this as an issue.

My Rupes seems to spin faster/more torque when you put a bit of pressure on it. I've never had it "stop spinning" or really even slow down.
+1 im completely on the same page with you, I think its more of being lazy on not wanting to use some technique as you said and just simply adjusting it until its spinning properly. thats just common sense, basically with the flex you could burn the paint and take off the paint on awkward panels with edging and etc..

Pureshine
10-18-2013, 11:37 PM
I have a PC, GG6 and the Rupes 15 You have too push really had to get any of them to stop rotating on speed 6. I love my Rupes 15 and next spring getting the 21 and since my insurance doesn't cover me burning through clear coat I'll pass on the Flex or rotary all day.

hernandez.art13
10-18-2013, 11:56 PM
I am comfortable using a Rotary and not burning the paint. I just can't seem to get the holograms on check.