Is Duragloss #111 considered the pre-wax cleaner?

[bcgreen]

before I apply my sealant so that it has a clean surface to bond to and I want to remove some very light marring and I don't want to remove any paint.

[Setec Astronomy]

No, 111 is a sealant. 601 Polish Bonding Agent is the pre-"wax" cleaner in the DG line.

[fightnews]

I don't know I will never buy another duragloss product because of the stupid naming they use. Calling their waxes "polish".... Come on, what is wrong with them?

[dlc95]

I don't know I will never buy another duragloss product because of the stupid naming they use. Calling their waxes "polish".... Come on, what is wrong with them?

I believe a lot of those formulas were developed in the 70's. I imagine the bulk of their sales aren't from the types who are on forums.

However, it would probably help them to merge with modern, universally professional terminology.

Personally I couldn't care less what they call the product, as long as the performance claims match the description on the bottle. It's going to take me more than an outdated heading to keep me from using their stuff.

[glfnaz]

Both 101 and 111 are sealants, but also contain chemical (non-abrasive) cleaners. Of their cleaner waxes / sealants I always preferred 501. It's made for boats, but is excellent on auto paint too. It's a great cleaner. Apply with a white pad on a DA and you won't believe how dirty the pad will get.

[FUNX650]

I don't know
I will never buy another duragloss product
because of the stupid naming they use.

Calling their waxes "polish"....
Come on, what is wrong with them?
Whoa Nellie!!

The only Wax in Duragloss’ product
line-up, that I know of, is the one that’s
shown below—#104—and it sure isn’t
called a polish!
http://www.autogeekonline.net/gallery/data/500/19A36DA2-0F26-45E5-841B-DF235CC4505F.jpeg

******************************************



Bob

[ski2]

Both 101 and 111 are sealants, but also contain chemical (non-abrasive) cleaners. Of their cleaner waxes / sealants I always preferred 501. It's made for boats, but is excellent on auto paint too. It's a great cleaner. Apply with a white pad on a DA and you won't believe how dirty the pad will get.

101 and 105 contain polymer sealants and non-abrasive cleaners. 111 is just a polymer sealant with no cleaners as far as the Duragloss website is concerned.

[fightnews]

I believe a lot of those formulas were developed in the 70's. I imagine the bulk of their sales aren't from the types who are on forums.

However, it would probably help them to merge with modern, universally professional terminology.

Personally I couldn't care less what they call the product, as long as the performance claims match the description on the bottle. It's going to take me more than an outdated heading to keep me from using their stuff.

I don't think so I'm pretty sure even 30 years ago a wax was a wax and polish was a polish.

[fightnews]

Whoa Nellie!!

The only Wax in Duragloss’ product
line-up, that I know of, is the one that’s
shown below—#104—and it sure isn’t
called a polish!
http://www.autogeekonline.net/gallery/data/500/19A36DA2-0F26-45E5-841B-DF235CC4505F.jpeg

******************************************



Bob

Well you are cleary not familiar with the duragloss line up of waxes then.


Wax
https://sep.yimg.com/ay/autogeek/duragloss-polish-cleaner-pc-101-6.gif

Wax
https://sep.yimg.com/ay/autogeek/duragloss-total-performance-polish-tpp-105-9.gif

Wax
https://sep.yimg.com/ay/autogeek/duragloss-clear-coat-polish-ccp-111-6.gif

You might want to bone up on the products around here Bob

[Setec Astronomy]

I don't know I will never buy another duragloss product because of the stupid naming they use. Calling their waxes "polish".... Come on, what is wrong with them?


I don't think so I'm pretty sure even 30 years ago a wax was a wax and polish was a polish.


You might want to bone up on the products around here Bob

It was certainly common for anything you wiped on your car (or furniture) that was intended to make it shine to be called a "polish". Heck, Zaino calls their sealants "polish" (hmmm...what an odd coincidence), and even Pledge was a "furniture polish". Pledge now seems to call theirs a "furniture spray" but what do you figure the cut was on the Meguiar's 1-10 scale back when they called it a "polish"?

Speaking of Meguiar's, how can they call #7 Show Car "Polish", when it's non-abrasive?

[hollerstiltner]

Well you are cleary not familiar with the duragloss line up of waxes then.


Wax
https://sep.yimg.com/ay/autogeek/duragloss-polish-cleaner-pc-101-6.gif

Wax
https://sep.yimg.com/ay/autogeek/duragloss-total-performance-polish-tpp-105-9.gif

Wax
https://sep.yimg.com/ay/autogeek/duragloss-clear-coat-polish-ccp-111-6.gif

You might want to bone up on the products around here Bob

Interesting. You’re bashing duragloss for what you think are incorrectly named products. Yet you’re referring to their line of sealants as all waxes.

[Klasse Act]

Although I agree that DG could use better verbiage on their bottles there's enough info here on them that will steer you into the correct product. Maybe someone can chime in on how or if a product like #105 can in fact correct soft paint or at least make it look better when using an RO and orange pad persay?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[FUNX650]

Well you are cleary not familiar with
the duragloss line up of waxes then.

Being that this is coming from a person
that doesn’t know the differences between
Waxes and Sealants...That’s pretty rich. :laughing:



You might want to bone up on the
products around here Bob
I’m certainly glad that AGO doesn’t
charge a forum Entertainment Tax...


Bob

[ski2]

101, 105, 111 have no Wax in them they contain polymer Sealants!!