robwoodgto
04-23-2017, 03:10 PM
I did not want to hijack another's thread but would like to get some opinions here:
I have UC and believe it is very user friendly and works quite well but there were some water spots that the UC did not seem to want to get rid of even after 2 complete cycles of 6 passes. This is when I moved to the M105, so today I used M105 with Thin Pro Orange pad and PC7424XP on my black Acura MDX. Started out with a 2' X 2' area but noticed by my 3rd pass the dusting started to get really bad and by the 4th to 5th pass tiny scratches started to appear. So, I assumed this was due to the spent product as well as my technique (possibly too slow of an arm movement) and decided to decrease my area to approx 14" X 14" and leave my arm movement of about 1" per second the same. I immediately noticed that I could get to the 5th/6th pass with minimum dusting. I also noticed no more tiny scratches. I would have went to the spraying a mist of water method to increase the work time and decrease chances of spent product scratching my paint but decreasing the area size worked well for me. Then used M205 with Thin Pro White pad and the finish came out really nice.
BTW, I primed the pad for both the M105 and M205.
My questions are:
1. Is the standard 2'X2' area subjective based on the product being used and the type of paint? Meaning, is this always a trial and error based on each scenario?
2. In situations like these if staying in the Meguiars line and moving to the M100 with the PC and Orange pad provide different results?
Thanks,
Ron
I have UC and believe it is very user friendly and works quite well but there were some water spots that the UC did not seem to want to get rid of even after 2 complete cycles of 6 passes. This is when I moved to the M105, so today I used M105 with Thin Pro Orange pad and PC7424XP on my black Acura MDX. Started out with a 2' X 2' area but noticed by my 3rd pass the dusting started to get really bad and by the 4th to 5th pass tiny scratches started to appear. So, I assumed this was due to the spent product as well as my technique (possibly too slow of an arm movement) and decided to decrease my area to approx 14" X 14" and leave my arm movement of about 1" per second the same. I immediately noticed that I could get to the 5th/6th pass with minimum dusting. I also noticed no more tiny scratches. I would have went to the spraying a mist of water method to increase the work time and decrease chances of spent product scratching my paint but decreasing the area size worked well for me. Then used M205 with Thin Pro White pad and the finish came out really nice.
BTW, I primed the pad for both the M105 and M205.
My questions are:
1. Is the standard 2'X2' area subjective based on the product being used and the type of paint? Meaning, is this always a trial and error based on each scenario?
2. In situations like these if staying in the Meguiars line and moving to the M100 with the PC and Orange pad provide different results?
Thanks,
Ron