DG 321 vs. DG 253

[AZpolisher15]

I've been using the DG 253 Tire and Rubber Dressing for a few years and love it. Awesome product. Leaves tires looking like brand new with one coat, shiny with additional coats. And it dries DRY. It's not oily and it doesn't attract dust. Great durability, too, for a non-permanent "Dressing". I also like it on trim, mud flaps, basically anything black on the exterior except paint. And the price is right.

But I've always been curious about DG 321 Non-silicone Tire Dressing. Can someone that has used 321 chime in and share your thoughts? Or better yet, compare/contrast the two products?

Duragloss Tire & Rubber Mat Dressing (TMD) #253 (http://www.autogeek.net/duragloss-tire---rubber-mat-dressing.html)
Duragloss Non Silicone Tire Dressing (NSD) #321 (http://www.autogeek.net/duragloss-non-silicone-tire-dressing.html)

[dlc95]

Great question!

I'd like to know as well.

[AZpolisher15]

Great question!

I'd like to know as well.

Instinct tells me that perhaps 321 was created for the body shop environment. But my instincts aren't always spot on (ex. walleye fishing). If it isn't simply a body shop safe version of 253, then I feel like I might be missing out on something. Totally satisfied with 253, but curiosity often gets the best of me when it comes to product options.

[davidc]

If you like 253 stay with it. I have used most everything DG makes. It has been quite a while since using it but I think it left the rubber looking more natural but like I said it did not last very long compared to 253.

Dave