The in-between and even the last step

[HUMP DIESEL]

If you have been on any forum long, you hear alot about "One step" or "Two Step" to LSP. I think recently a good number of guys are getting great results in doing this, but I think that we may be selling some details short.

Lately I have seen where the in-between step has gained a considerable amount of refinement and clarity. What I mean by an in-between step is that compound or medium polish that everyone seems to have, but not many people use.

Classic example would be to use something like HD Cut and then HD Adapt and then finish with HD Polish. Some would say go from cut to polish, but try next time you are doing a correction project to do your cutting stage, then switch out to the medium (In-between) polish and a light cutting pad to do a pass. Once that is complete, wipe the whole car down with Eraser or equivalent and then step down to the Finish polish on a fine pad. I can bet that many of you will see a significant clarity and depth change.

Obviously, this thought process is nothing new in terms of detailing, some may even consider it too time consuming, but I can tell that when I do this type of polishing, I get much better results in not that much longer time.

Today's chemicals are great and doing one steps and light two steps is more the norm, but if you ever get that one that you just want to see, try it for yourself.

I suspect Mike could pull up some older articles he has written about the different steps.


Just some food for thought.

HUMP

[Zubair]

If you removed the defects in the compounding step why do a redundant step and further remove precious clear coat?

[HUMP DIESEL]

If you removed the defects in the compounding step why do a redundant step and further remove precious clear coat?

To further refine the finish. Same reason why after compounding, you polish to remove the haze left behind.

HUMP

[JeffM]

I go from a heavy step to a polish, then essence.

[custmsprty]

To further refine the finish. Same reason why after compounding, you polish to remove the haze left behind.

HUMP

If I got results with Adapt from this swirled out mess to this amazing clarity why would I want to bother with any additional steps other than finishing with an LSP?

http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w421/custmsprty/Z06_zpsv67jj9gi.jpg (http://s1075.photobucket.com/user/custmsprty/media/Z06_zpsv67jj9gi.jpg.html)

http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w421/custmsprty/Z05_zpsw5hkxdei.jpg (http://s1075.photobucket.com/user/custmsprty/media/Z05_zpsw5hkxdei.jpg.html)



Or this never detailed swirled out oxidized mess of a Chevy with FG400 in one step then and LSP?

http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w421/custmsprty/chevy6_zpsa1487b1e.jpg (http://s1075.photobucket.com/user/custmsprty/media/chevy6_zpsa1487b1e.jpg.html)

http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w421/custmsprty/chevy_zpsb410a9e7.jpg (http://s1075.photobucket.com/user/custmsprty/media/chevy_zpsb410a9e7.jpg.html)

Swirl free with FG400 in one step.

http://i1075.photobucket.com/albums/w421/custmsprty/chevy2_zps5e1794ea.jpg (http://s1075.photobucket.com/user/custmsprty/media/chevy2_zps5e1794ea.jpg.html)

[7.3powerstroke]

Thanks for the tip!

[Zubair]

To further refine the finish. Same reason why after compounding, you polish to remove the haze left behind.

HUMP

In the rare event the compound needed refining, any finishing polish should clear that up, no need to cut paint again with a medium polish and gain nothing in clarity or shine, just reduced paint thickness.

[wing commander]

[QUOTE=HUMP DIESEL;1391454]To further refine the finish. Same reason why after compounding, you polish to remove the haze left behind.

I understand this is for further perfecting the paint. I tried this on my hood and could not see the difference,however the paint must have been better under a microscope because it washed bugs off easier and felt slicker when drying that 3 stepped area compared to the other 2 stepped areas. Just for fun it was noticeable and for my own enjoyment worth it.

[TTQ B4U]

Classic example would be to use something like HD Cut and then HD Adapt and then finish with HD Polish.


If I got results with Adapt from this swirled out mess to this amazing clarity why would I want to bother with any additional steps other than finishing with an LSP?

I'm with custmsprty on this, especially as it relates to HDAdapt. There's no need for HP Polish after using Adapt if done correctly. I have used it on a Solid Black 2015 Mustang and even tried HDSpeed after just to "see" if I could improve upon the black-glass it left behind and the answer was no. I went straight to a LSP without issue.

I do think with some products like Megs Ulitmate Compound and perhaps other pairings you will but with Adapt, I have yet to use it and see a difference. The only additional time that I will add that has yielded any difference is when using a Jeweling polish like McKey's 37 and a nice Glaze which I use Chem Guys Blacklight.

Many of today's products finish so darn nicely that you're really going to split hairs to see a difference if you do at all.

[idriveblackcars]

This year after a long winter my personal car hardly needed any correction at all. I had full intentions of doing 2 steps as usual but the yellow Rupes pad finishes so good I didn't even need to use the white. I didn't even waste my time this year going back over it. I did half my hood with the Rupes white pad and polish to match and literally could not see a difference even under lights.

[richy]

The times where a 3 step process has been needed is when the paint was so absolutely terrible that the first step was removing the terrible, but still leaving light marks itself. A mid level correction followed by a final polish made it perfect. It does add a lot of time, but really, the time is being taken at the first stage.

[parttimer]

Well, I look at the "in-between" step as step two in a 3 step process then. Very seldom do I find I need to do that, after shc300 or fg400, i can follow it with 2500 on a polishing pad and be done. MAYBE, if you are doing a concourse level job you would resort to this all out effort, for 99% of the people, two step is overwhelming to them in the end results.

[FUNX650]

IMO:

-Preservation of as much of the top-coat
paint-film of any paint system should be
of the highest priority.

-With that in mind:
Unless the vehicle is going to be a "Show
Car", (and not be bombarded with all of
the contaminates a Daily Driver faces),
it is performing a disservice, to the vehicle
and its owner, to do otherwise.



Bob

[Mike Phillips]

If you have been on any forum long, you hear alot about "One step" or "Two Step" to LSP. I think recently a good number of guys are getting great results in doing this, but I think that we may be selling some details short.

Lately I have seen where the in-between step has gained a considerable amount of refinement and clarity. What I mean by an in-between step is that compound or medium polish that everyone seems to have, but not many people use.

I suspect Mike could pull up some older articles he has written about the different steps.


Just some food for thought.

HUMP


Good thread, good discussion, let me add my two cents...


FACT: Quality name brand compounds work so well today they leave the paint looking like you just wiped off a coat of wax. That is to say, properly worked, a quality compound due to the abrasive technology will leave the paint looking clear and glossy, the same way perfect paint looks after you wipe off a coat of wax.


PROBLEM: All great compounds and polishes use some type of polishing oils to lubricate the surface while the abrasives do the cutting. Without the polishing oils the risk of scouring (scouring is a form of scratching), exists and defeats the entire purpose of polishing the paint to make it look good.

Herein lies the problem with doing only a one-step with an aggressive compound and a cutting pad. After compounding and wiping off the residue the paint can look amazing. And I mean absolutely amazing. The problem is the polishing oils can be masking or camouflaging dull, hazy paint caused by


The abrasives in the compound.
The aggressiveness of the pad.
The paint being removed while at the same time being buffed against the paint.
The mixture of the compound and the paint (that has been removed) being buffed against the paint.
The pressure applied to the pad against the paint over time.




Even if you clean your pad after every section pass WHILE you're making the section pass there is removed paint and everything the compound brings to the surface being buffed against the paint.

If you're using a cutting pad, for example a foam cutting pad or a microfiber cutting pad, the pad itself is a type of abrasive and it will not leave as perfect of a finish as a soft foam polishing or finishing pad.


So here's the deal, while the results after the compounding step may look amazing, my experience is there are defiantly dull and hazy patches over various body panels that you simply cannot see.

If you apply a wax or sealant after the compounding step you will have furthered the masking effects with products that don't easily wash off when exposed to water in the form of rainy weather or repeated car washed. Thus you don't see the dull hazy patches. If this is your own car and you regularly wax the paint after compounding you many never see the dull hazy areas of paint. If this is a customer's car and you never see them again you don't know how they're going to take care of your work so you don't what happens down the road.


Skeptical?

All you have to do to see the dull hazy results after using an aggressive compound with a cutting pad is this simple test.


Machine compound a black car and then wash it with a strong detergent wash or in some other fashion chemically strip the polishing oils off the paint. Then move the car into into bright, overhead sunlight and inspect.


You will then understand no matter how great the abrasive technology is used in a compound, if you're machine applying it using a cutting pad along with the five factors I listed above the reality of leaving hazy looking paint is for all practical reasons... a sure thing.

You might not see this on a light colored car simply because the human eye struggles to see visual imperfections on light colors. You certainly won't see it if you don't thoroughly strip the oils off the paint and inspect in bright sunlight and how many of you do this?


The remedy?

The good news is with the quality abrasive technology being used today in compounds and polishes you can easily remove any dull or hazy areas by following the compound and the cutting pad with a secondary step. You certainly don't have to use 2 steps to refine the results of the first step like had to be done in the old days when even the best compounds on the market left the paint looking scoured.


The above is just my take.... your experience may be different so take from it what you will.


:)

[Mike Phillips]

If you read my post above take note that I always choose each word I post very carefully. That's my writing style.

In the post above I wrote about using compounds with cutting pads and explained there are multiple factors when using this combination that can lead to scoured paint or at a minimum dull hazy patches on a clearcoated car that you cannot see as the polishing oils will mask these defects.

But what if you use a compound with a less aggressive pad? What if you use a quality compound with great abrasive technology with a foam polishing pad?


Foam cutting pads have a SHARPNESS to them. You can demonstrate this to yourself by simply drawing your fingers across a new, clean foam cutting pad and comparing how that feels to a soft foam polishing or finishing pad. You can feel the sharpness or coarseness of the foam. This is what give a cutting pad cut. (I show this and tons of information like this in all my 3-day detailing classes (http://www.autogeek.net/detailing-boot-camp.html))


So can you do a one-step with a quality compound and a foam polishing pad without leaving dull or hazy paint at the surface level?

I think it's possible. Just like any process a huge factor is the polishabilty of the paint. And of course there's a difference between what can be done perfectly and what you can get away with.


When Menzerna FG400 was first introduced to the U.S. market I think I may have been the first to use it and post a review. If you can find a review with a date stamp before November 11th, 2012 then feel free to share it in this thread.



Here's my article. Note I use Lake Country Hybrid pads, specifically the white foam polishing pads. Also note the color. It's a light colored pinkish rose color. (forget what the owner told me it is called)


So use good judgment when deciding how many steps to do for any detailing project and remember if you're detailing for money don't do show car detailing, (multiple step process), when you should be doing production detailing, (one step process), as you'll go broke.



New Menzerna FG 400 - One-Step Show Car Makeover (http://www.autogeekonline.net/forum/show-n-shine/57592-new-menzerna-fg-400-one-step-show-car-makeover.html)



http://www.autogeekonline.net/gallery/data/1635/1957_Belair_Mike_Phillips_003.jpg



:)