autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreCars WallpaperLink To UsvBGarageGallery

Go Back   Auto Geek Online Auto Detailing Forum > Buffers and Polishers > Porter Cable 7424 & Buffing Pad Forum

Register FAQ Upload Photos Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Featured Photos
by admin
· · ·
Autogeek's 3rd Annual Detail Fest
531 photos
29 comments
by admin
· · ·
Sema Show 2008
433 photos
13 comments
by admin
· · ·
Sema Show 2008
433 photos
13 comments
by admin
· · ·
Autogeek's 3rd Annual Detail Fest
531 photos
29 comments

» Autogeek Car Care Products
Dodo Juice Car Waxes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2007, 01:59 PM
D&D Auto Detailing's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,153
6.5" Pads w/ 5" BP

Ive been thinking about this and Im not so sure 6.5" pads with a 5" backing plate is very efficient. I mean you've got a whole 1.5" around the BP where the pad isnt seeing the same amount of pressure. Sure this is one of the reasons you need to overlap your passes, but wouldnt a 6" BP with 6.5" pads be a lot more efficient?
__________________
D&D Auto Detailing
-Dan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:03 PM
FMINUS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 1,516
Ive asked this question before and the response I got was that it didnt matter. But in my experience, I feel the same way as you do.

Also the extra padding seems to curve up when pressure is applied, taking it off the surface of the paint... The only benefit I see is extra foam to protect the backing plate to hit against the paint.
__________________


06 Honda S2000 (SOLD!)
08 BMW M5
05 Acura TSX (Wife's car)
02 BMW M3
00 NSX (SOLD)
05 NSX Imola Orange (Looking to buy)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:06 PM
D&D Auto Detailing's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,153
Exactly, I agree 100%. The edges do curve up and the only benefit I see is extra protection. Dare I say I dont need a whole 1.5". Half an inch is plenty for an experienced user IMO. Im going to order a 6" BP so I can actually use my 6.5" pad to its fullest. Otherwise I might as well just be using the 5.5" pads.
__________________
D&D Auto Detailing
-Dan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 902
My thoughts (keep in mind I'm pretty new to using the PC)...

You don't have 1.5" of protection, you have .75" inches assuming your pad is centered a mere 1/2 inch more than the .5 you indicated you wanted for safety (.75 on either side of the plate).

Also, it seems like the "extra would provide some give for panels that were bowed inward (is that concave or convex?) or for any irregularity in the flatness of the panel.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:25 PM
D&D Auto Detailing's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,153
If the panel isnt completely flat then Ill switch to my 4 or even 3.5" pad. I never only use 6.5" pads for a car. So that isnt a problem. I havent measured, but I doubt I center my pads more then 3mm off.
__________________
D&D Auto Detailing
-Dan

Last edited by D&D Auto Detailing : 08-09-2007 at 02:28 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 902
If the pads are centered (which I don't doubt they are) they you only have 3/4" overhang, right? That just doesn't sound like that much to me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-2007, 02:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 887
There is a limit how much of an extra foam will transfer the pressure. That limit depends on foam thickness and density, and even design of backing plate, among other factors. Everything else does practically nothing for you(you can easily see that if you take a look at surface of pad after using it with product that will leave "footprint" on the pad). I consider that dead weight counter-productive as it means there is more weight in the pad than what is neccessary which increases load on motor, decreases it's lifetime, decreases efficiency (torque and temperature) and increases vibrations (once again increasing load and decreasing lifetime).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-09-2007, 03:11 PM
D&D Auto Detailing's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoranC
There is a limit how much of an extra foam will transfer the pressure. That limit depends on foam thickness and density, and even design of backing plate, among other factors. Everything else does practically nothing for you(you can easily see that if you take a look at surface of pad after using it with product that will leave "footprint" on the pad). I consider that dead weight counter-productive as it means there is more weight in the pad than what is neccessary which increases load on motor, decreases it's lifetime, decreases efficiency (torque and temperature) and increases vibrations (once again increasing load and decreasing lifetime).
So what exactly are you saying? Obviously the extra unused foam is the dead weight right? So do you step down to 5.5" pad, or step up to 6" BP?
__________________
D&D Auto Detailing
-Dan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2007, 03:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by D&D Auto Detailing
So what exactly are you saying? Obviously the extra unused foam is the dead weight right? So do you step down to 5.5" pad, or step up to 6" BP?
I am saying that you need to match size depending on what you are after and what you can do while taking all this into account. Let's say you are using PC and feel bigger pad surface is what you want to use at the moment. You step up backing plate, otherwise you will not have any benefit from bigger pad you want and you will have drawbacks. Later you want to use tool that you do not have bigger than 5" bp for (or to be precise 4.75"). You will not get any benefit IMHO by sticking with 6.5" pads, but you will get drawbacks. You would be better off by stepping down pad to 5.5" or even to 5".
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-09-2007, 03:45 PM
D&D Auto Detailing's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,153
Alright, thanks.
__________________
D&D Auto Detailing
-Dan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I cut my 6.5" CCS pads to make'em smaller? bxtreme Porter Cable 7424 & Buffing Pad Forum 8 10-26-2007 03:03 PM
So what is the verdict? CCS pads or good ole' flat pads? Avengeance Porter Cable 7424 & Buffing Pad Forum 10 08-01-2007 05:43 PM
4" pads vs. 6.5" pads? makdaddy626 Porter Cable 7424 & Buffing Pad Forum 12 07-21-2007 08:21 PM
Edge 2000 4" Pads - PRODUCT REVIEW MikeyC Auto Detailing Tools and Accessories 12 11-15-2006 06:59 PM
Mega Cyclo Polisher Kit admin New Car Care Products 13 04-21-2006 03:40 PM

» January 2009
S M T W T F S
28293031 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.


vBulletin style developed by Transverse Styles

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©PBMA - Autogeekonline.net® All Rights Reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21