autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreCars WallpaperLink To UsvBGarageGallery

Go Back   Auto Geek Online Auto Detailing Forum > Buffers and Polishers > Porter Cable 7424 & Buffing Pad Forum

Register FAQ Upload Photos Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Featured Photos
by admin
· · ·
Autogeek's 3rd Annual Detail Fest
531 photos
22 comments
by admin
· · ·
Sema Show 2008
433 photos
6 comments
by Meghan
· · ·
Sema Show 2008
433 photos
6 comments
by admin
· · ·
Sema Show 2008
433 photos
6 comments

» Autogeek Car Care Products
Porter Cable 7424 & Pad Kit with CCS pads!
Tags: , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2006, 06:46 PM
abrcrombe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,276
4in 6in 8in

What pad size is better for polishing. 4, 6, or 8 inches. I know Neo uses 4 inches, and he always has great advice. What do you guys/girls use? I use 6 inches, but am willing to change.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-24-2006, 06:50 PM
killrwheels@autogeek's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 10,093
I like the standard 6 inch pads personally, but found that the 4 inch units worked better on my past Vette because they fit inside the body side moldings. So it appears that each are best given the car and finish ... cannot go wrong with either 4,6,8.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2006, 06:52 PM
abrcrombe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,276
Neo says he only gets results from the 4 in pads. Do you see a difference in performance?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2006, 06:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrcrombe
Neo says he only gets results from the 4 in pads. Do you see a difference in performance?

Maybe maneuverability
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2006, 06:57 PM
abrcrombe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,276
By manueverability, do you mean him being able to put it exactly where he wants or to get into smaller spaces? His Tc has pretty wide open panels.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-24-2006, 07:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,904
yes .tight spots....or maybe the ease of use since its a smaller tighter pass.............. but as far as final finish??? NAW.......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2006, 07:04 PM
abrcrombe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,276
Do you use 6 inchers?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2006, 07:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,904
6 inch pads for me.......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-24-2006, 10:06 PM
dengood1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,031
I REALLY like the 5" low profile orange cutting pad I got with my pc kit. It's very maneuverable and operates VERY smoothly with the 5" backing plate because I assume I can center it better. It also rotates much more rapidly (pad rotating freely), which I like. Sometimes I notice the larger pads kinda sitting in one place, not rotating much probably because I'm applying too much pressure I'm sure it's not important, but it seems it works the product better and the polishes break down quicker. I like the larger pads for finishing. Just my 2 cents----still learning
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2006, 01:47 AM
Neothin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Port St. Lucie, FL
Posts: 590
well, ya, you guys already know what i use.

my reasoning-
smaller pads take more pressure to bog the machine down. as such, i can apply more pressure to the pc and still have it orbit at a faster rate than i could with a larger pad.
the force of the pc is concentrated into a smaller area. think of it this way, you apply pressure to the pc using a large pad and then again with a small pad. the pressure remains constant throughout both tests. the larger pad spreads that pressure out over a larger area and as such less pressure is applied per square inch of pad space. with smaller pads, that same force is distributed over a smaller area which in turns gives you more force per area.
I like how i can fit the machine into smaller spaces with the small pads. just taking a look at my tC, the air ducts to the left and right of the lower grille, the a-b-c pillar, and the area under the mirrors gets really tight. small pads let me get to those areas easily.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are the FLEX's in yet?!!?!? m4gician Auto Detailing Tools and Accessories 22 02-03-2008 01:03 PM
5.5 or 6in pads for rotarys?? MoparAddict Auto Detailing Tools and Accessories 2 11-26-2007 09:38 AM

» November 2008
S M T W T F S
262728293031 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 123456
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.


vBulletin style developed by Transverse Styles

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©PBMA - Autogeekonline.net® All Rights Reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21