autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Member Newdetailer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia area
    Posts
    327

    6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    Which do you guys like better overall? I have both and I'm not really sure I care for the 6.5's? I just wanted to get you're guys take on it before I try and unload them somewhere. Help me understand the advantages of the 6.5? To me it seems harder to use and it wanted a lot me product (which makes sense). IDK let me know what you guys think?

  2. #2
    Senior Member BobbyG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Southeast, MA
    Posts
    13,211

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    Technically speaking, the area of the two are as follows;

    Surface Area - 5 1/2 pad = 23.75 in²

    Surface Area - 6 1/2 pad = 33.18 in²

    All else equal, the larger pad should be able to correct the area in less time and time is money....

    BobbyG - 2004 Millennium Yellow Z06 Corvette

  3. #3
    Senior Member Newdetailer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia area
    Posts
    327

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    Quote Originally Posted by BobbyG View Post
    Technically speaking, the area of the two are as follows;

    Surface Area - 5 1/2 pad = 23.75 in˛

    Surface Area - 6 1/2 pad = 33.18 in˛

    All else equal, the larger pad should be able to correct the area in less time and time is money....
    Yeah, but doesn't it take more product to load up the pad? Can you do larger that a 2X2 section or is the idea to do the same 2X2 quicker?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Robert8194's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Hoover, AL
    Posts
    1,045
    Quote Originally Posted by Newdetailer1 View Post
    Yeah, but doesn't it take more product to load up the pad? Can you do larger that a 2X2 section or is the idea to do the same 2X2 quicker?
    Theoretically it takes the same amount of product to polish the car. Even if it takes more to prime the 6.5, it is going to go farther. I wouldn't change the size of a section I did but as Bobby said, it should take less time to cover the same area with a larger pad. It probably comes down more to what you are comfortable with. Some people find the larger pads to walk more on the 3401. I think you hit it with your last question. You do the same section faster.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Newdetailer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia area
    Posts
    327

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    Ok. I guess I'll just give the 6.5's another chance?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The "OC"
    Posts
    878

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    BobbyG is right. Everything being equal, a 6.5" pad has greater surface area and will correct that 2x2 section faster.

    Now there's the preference factor that is completely subjective. To this, I've used 7.5" Chemical Guy self center pads on the 3401 and love it on larger cars.
    There is vast amounts of knowledge at your fingertips, use Google, Youtube, and the search button.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Danube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    864

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    I personally prefer 5.5" and 4" pads with 3401 but that's a personal preference.
    Flex 3401 & PE14


  8. #8
    Senior Member Bunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Posts
    6,087

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    I picked up the new Lake Country backing plates for the Flex.

    It will be interesting to see if the 6-in backing plate changes how a 6.5-in pad performs (hold more of the pad against the plate) both polishing and handling.
    Al
    The Need to Bead

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    143

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunky View Post
    I picked up the new Lake Country backing plates for the Flex.

    It will be interesting to see if the 6-in backing plate changes how a 6.5-in pad performs (hold more of the pad against the plate) both polishing and handling.
    I'm curious to see how the new LC backing plate affects handling. I tend to be skeptical about aftermarket adapters of any kind for any tool. If they work well, I'm open to changing my mind.

    Regards,

    Dan.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Danube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    864

    Re: 6.5's or 5.5's Flex 3401

    Its interesting that so many of the LC adapters were sold, but no review as yet?!?
    Flex 3401 & PE14


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-17-2013, 05:20 AM
  2. Flex 3401 RPM & OPM
    By mbret2004 in forum Flex Polishers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-12-2013, 10:12 AM
  3. FLEX XC 3401, FLEX L3403, or FLEX PE14-2-150 for Gel Coat
    By MichaelD in forum Boat & Marine Craft Detailing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-16-2012, 01:28 AM
  4. Flex 3401
    By Diversion in forum Flex Polishers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-02-2012, 08:09 AM
  5. Flex 3401 OPM
    By skipper1 in forum Flex Polishers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-17-2010, 05:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» August 2016

31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 123