DuraGloss #111 clearcoat polish....thoughts

[Klasse Act]

Originally Posted by davidc

I have some small clear plastic flip top plastic bottles that I squirted 501 or 105 till 3/4 full then used the squirt bottle that has the Aqua Wax and just squirted in on top of the 501/105 until the bottle was filled to the neck line which allows about 1/2" air gap and shook like he**. The Aqua Wax mixed right in. The bottles I used come from Zaino when you order ZFX.

Dave

I use the same ones Dave, so you mix AW w/your polish-sealant from DG, interesting, have to try this. It should spread even easier since its got 25% pure liquid in it, thanks for the tip, love this thread

[debordj]

I'm a little confused still. I'm gonna do ladies car this weekend using 501/601 and then putting 105/601. Am I wasting my time if one takes off the other. Seems like that is the application du jor.

[richy]

Originally Posted by debordj

I'm a little confused still. I'm gonna do ladies car this weekend using 501/601 and then putting 105/601. Am I wasting my time if one takes off the other. Seems like that is the application du jor.

Not at all! 105 will definitely not remove the 501. The combo is stellar. I've been doing this for several years now, initially, on the recommendation of Jerry at Duragloss. (He is the one who creates the formulae...he should know!!!)

[Shortspark]

I am starting to believe that the combination use of Duragloss products is directly related to the condition of the vehicle's paint. I think that is their intent although they don't really come out and say it that way. 501, for example, is formulated to provide a pretty thorough cleaning, primarily for marine application, but has proven itself as an outstanding AIO for autos because it has good cleaning ability and provides protection. I would use this if the car was not well maintained or simply needed more cleaning as a one step product. 105 has less cleaning ability but does have a little. It is primarily a sealant and lasts a long time. I would use this on a moderately to well maintained vehicle. I really don't know why it would be used over 501. 111 has no cleaning ability as it is a pure sealant and should be used in combination (sort of as a topper) for either 501 or 105 or, if the car is brand new, by itself with the bonding agent mixed in.

My car is new and the paint is in great shape. I have used 601/105 topped with AquaWax and it looks great (It is a new Mercedes M series SUV in Diamond White). Next time I will try 601/111 topped with AquaWax because I have heard 111 looks even better with white paint. I am anxious to see what the difference will be between the 105 and 111 as to appearance and protection.

[Mike.Phillips@Autogeek]

Check this thread out...

Sign-up - Honda Extreme Makeover with Duragloss!

The paint is completely flat and dull



Duragloss Extreme Makeover
Since a polished surface will hold up and last longer in the elements than a textured surface I'm going to machine polish this paint to restore a clear, glossy smooth surface and then coat it with something.

For this project I'll be using the new Ultra Microfiber pads by Lake Country. For chemicals we're going to use products from Duragloss.

Duragloss Products

[truckbutt]

Originally Posted by Mike.Phillips@Autogeek

Check this thread out...

Sign-up - Honda Extreme Makeover with Duragloss!

The paint is completely flat and dull



Duragloss Extreme Makeover
Since a polished surface will hold up and last longer in the elements than a textured surface I'm going to machine polish this paint to restore a clear, glossy smooth surface and then coat it with something.

For this project I'll be using the new Ultra Microfiber pads by Lake Country. For chemicals we're going to use products from Duragloss.

Duragloss Products

Nice collection. Maybe one of the nice people in the warehouse can hook you up with some DG #601 to add to your collection of tools.

[Klasse Act]

I used #101 and then #111 and you could spray AW ontop of the #111 to remove and also add to the protection, but where would you use #105/501 in the process? I think our positive comments about DG has gotten Mike's attention as he's using them on that Honda!

[richy]

Originally Posted by Klasse Act

I used #101 and then #111 and you could spray AW ontop of the #111 to remove and also add to the protection, but where would you use #105/501 in the process? I think our positive comments about DG has gotten Mike's attention as he's using them on that Honda!

Have you tried using AW as your final wipe? That's what I do. Your advantage to spraying on the AW on the cured 111 is what, that it removes more easily? I have never tried that.

[Klasse Act]

Originally Posted by richy

Have you tried using AW as your final wipe? That's what I do. Your advantage to spraying on the AW on the cured 111 is what, that it removes more easily? I have never tried that.

I really don't do it to make removing #111 easier, I mean its already VERY easy but rather to do a combo of removal and application. Do you think I'm not getting the full effects of AW doing it like this? I have applied AW afterwards but it was usually the next day or something, not right after, only ontop of the #111.

[richy]

Originally Posted by Klasse Act

I really don't do it to make removing #111 easier, I mean its already VERY easy but rather to do a combo of removal and application. Do you think I'm not getting the full effects of AW doing it like this? I have applied AW afterwards but it was usually the next day or something, not right after, only ontop of the #111.

Gosh, now that's a hard question to answer. You know, the next time you're doing a job like that, if you think of it, split the hood and do a 50/50 and see if you notice any difference. I find AW, like 105 and the other DG sealants, looks better the next day. You might be losing a bit of its ability, but even if you were, I would guess it would be so minimal. AW is so strong, you can put it on a wet panel and it still does its job...can you tell I'm thinking while I type...so now that I ponder it, I've changed my answer. No, I don't think it would minimize the results at all and if it saves time, even better!