autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsGalleryDetailing How To's
 
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 61
  1. #1
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    This would be the case ONLY when using surbuf pads. It's pretty simple if you think about it. With surbuf pads, you don't want to use pressure(the weight of the polisher). So, with forced rotation being a non-factor, the non-forced rotational DA's(G110v2, GG 6", PCXP) spin and oscillate FASTER than the Flex 3401, therefore, it will correct better. Get it? This may something that is already widely understood, I've just never seen it mentioned. Who would've ever thunk a DA could out-perform the 3401? Opinions?

    FWIW, when pressure is needed, the 3401 would easily out-perform a traditional DA.
    Last edited by WRAPT C5Z06; 09-28-2010 at 12:55 AM.
    '03 Corvette Z06

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    176
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Quote Originally Posted by 07 z-oh-6 View Post
    ... Who would've ever thunk a DA could out-perform the 3401?...


    Quote Originally Posted by 07 z-oh-6 View Post
    FWIW, when pressure is needed, the 3401 would easily out-perform a traditional DA.
    Yeah, right!!!!! Not easily... and not always true!

    My old G110 will outspin a Flex XC 3401 VRG even under a load.
    Not knocking a Flex or a Makita BO6040 or a Bosch 1250 DEVS or a Festool Rotex RO150FEQ.
    A lot has to do with the pad type and compound... and dare I say it..... .... the method of application.

    Just saying... don't BE knocking my random orbital... ... I know you're not.

  3. #3
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Brown View Post



    Yeah, right!!!!! Not easily... and not always true!
    I only said it to get a reaction out of you.

    '03 Corvette Z06

  4. #4
    Super Member sohail99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    921
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Nice! Didn't know about that!

    so correction is better with surbuff pads and traditional DAs?

  5. #5
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Quote Originally Posted by sohail99 View Post
    Nice! Didn't know about that!

    so correction is better with surbuff pads and traditional DAs?
    When coupled with M105, Kevin Brown Method(priming pad), I'd say the potential with a traditional DA would be better considering more pressure is a non factor with surbufs. Maybe Kevin Brown can expand on this?
    '03 Corvette Z06

  6. #6
    Super Member sohail99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    921
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Wow! nice!

    I switched from LC CCS pads to hydro tech as the CCS pads were kinda like a hassle for the DA(as its too thick and becomes heavy when loaded with the product)

    Now, I guess this will go in my cart next!

    + read a few reviews and 'how to' s on surbuff pads and many say that the correction is comparable to a rotary!

  7. #7
    Super Member Mister B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    594
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Quote Originally Posted by 07 z-oh-6 View Post
    With surbuf pads, you don't want to use pressure.

    This may something that is already widely understood, I've just never seen it mentioned.
    I don't think I have ever seen that mentioned before either. I did not know you did not need to use any pressure when using the surbuf pads.

    So you basically just need the weight of the machine only when going over the paint?
    Brian

  8. #8
    Mike Phillips
    Guest

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    You need more than just the weight of the machine.

    If you take any of the 3 DA Polishers and just flutter them on the surface of your cars finish and by flutter I mean just hold them so it's just the weight of the machine you can actually see the pad stop rotating and even spin backwards.

    As soon as you apply some pressure the pad starts rotating clockwise.

    I demonstrated this at the last class in front of 30 people.


    On page 2 of this thread,

    Pictures & Comments from September 19th Detailing 102 Class

    You see Charles working the G110v2 with a finishing pad and M205 and at one point having a problem maintaining pad rotation, this is where I took the polisher, placed it on the hood and turned it on either the 5 or 6 speed setting and then held it so the pad was perfectly flat but just fluttering over the surface, and the pad virtually stopped under power and just vibrated. No pressure at all on the buffing pad. Then it would sporadically spin backwards and then stop again and just vibrate.

    As soon as I applied pressure to it... it would start to rotate in a consistent manner.

    Charles working with the Meguiar's G110v2





    So you need more than the weight of the machine, applying 'some' is necessary to get the pad to rotate consistently.


    There's been occasions when someone posts to the forum or calls our Tech Line and states their pad won't rotate even with no pressure applied to the tool. Soon as I read or hear that I instantly know what they're talking about and the problem isn't with the tool, it's a Newbie issue of being scared to apply pressure to the machine.

    If I get them on the phone or in a thread I tell them to put at least 5 pounds of pressure to the head of the unit and the pad will start rotating. They go out into their garage, do this and Shazam! The issue, they thought was a problem, is now gone...

    So just the weight of the machine isn't going to work, you need to apply some level of pressure.

    Different abrasives react differently with DA Polishers and pad combinations and there's always new technology being introduced so even the way we do things today could change tomorrow. That's why it's always important to be open to new ideas, new products and new procedures.



  9. #9
    Junior Member sharpcard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    68
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    If I understand it right the flex operates at 3200 - 9600 rpm (orbit rate) and the PC at 2500 - 6800 rpm (orbit rate). How would the PC be faster?

  10. #10
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    12,615
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A situation when a non-forced rotational DA's will correct BETTER than a Flex 3401....

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike.Phillips@Autogeek View Post
    You need more than just the weight of the machine.

    If you take any of the 3 DA Polishers and just flutter them on the surface of your cars finish and by flutter I mean just hold them so it's just the weight of the machine you can actually see the pad stop rotating and even spin backwards.

    As soon as you apply some pressure the pad starts rotating clockwise.

    I demonstrated this at the last class in front of 30 people.


    On page 2 of this thread,

    Pictures & Comments from September 19th Detailing 102 Class

    You see Charles working the G110v2 with a finishing pad and M205 and at one point having a problem maintaining pad rotation, this is where I took the polisher, placed it on the hood and turned it on either the 5 or 6 speed setting and then held it so the pad was perfectly flat but just fluttering over the surface, and the pad virtually stopped under power and just vibrated. No pressure at all on the buffing pad. Then it would sporadically spin backwards and then stop again and just vibrate.

    As soon as I applied pressure to it... it would start to rotate in a consistent manner.

    Charles working with the Meguiar's G110v2





    So you need more than the weight of the machine, applying 'some' is necessary to get the pad to rotate consistently.


    There's been occasions when someone posts to the forum or calls our Tech Line and states their pad won't rotate even with no pressure applied to the tool. Soon as I read or hear that I instantly know what they're talking about and the problem isn't with the tool, it's a Newbie issue of being scared to apply pressure to the machine.

    If I get them on the phone or in a thread I tell them to put at least 5 pounds of pressure to the head of the unit and the pad will start rotating. They go out into their garage, do this and Shazam! The issue, they thought was a problem, is now gone...

    So just the weight of the machine isn't going to work, you need to apply some level of pressure.

    Different abrasives react differently with DA Polishers and pad combinations and there's always new technology being introduced so even the way we do things today could change tomorrow. That's why it's always important to be open to new ideas, new products and new procedures.


    Hey Mike,

    I'm just referring to the surbuf pads. With surbuf pads, you want the micro-fingers to be upright as possible. If the micro-fingers bend to much, you'll lose cut and have excess micro-marring. So, when I say weight of the polisher, there's still 5-6 ponds of pressure being applied which seems to work with surbuf pads.
    '03 Corvette Z06

Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-29-2019, 08:54 PM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-12-2017, 07:37 AM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-17-2013, 05:20 AM
  4. FLEX XC 3401, FLEX L3403, or FLEX PE14-2-150 for Gel Coat
    By MichaelD in forum Boat & Marine Craft Detailing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-16-2012, 01:28 AM
  5. What a FLEX can correct.
    By shadybreal in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 07:13 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» April 2024

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1234