autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum Autogeek on TV
car wax, car care and auto detailing forumAutogeekonline autogeekonline car wax, car care and auto detailing forum HomeForumBlogAutogeek.net StoreDetailing Classes with Mike PhillipsvbGarageGalleryDetailing How To'sDetailing How ToFacebookTwitterYouTube

Go Back   Auto Geek Online Auto Detailing Forum > Detailer's Library > Ask the Expert featuring Mike Phillips

Register FAQ Upload Photos Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Autogeek Online Classes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2010, 10:11 AM   #1
Director of Training
 
Mike.Phillips@Autogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stuart, Florida
Posts: 24,977
"Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"

"Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"


I'm a strong advocate of giving due credit where credit is due for both professional and personal reasons. To this point I want to give credit to Meguiar's for this quote and philosophy, or approach towards working on automotive paints. I learned this philosophy from Meguiar's when I went to work for them in 1988 as an Outside Sales Rep and Trainer for Oregon, Washington and Idaho.

I know they've been teaching this practice probably from their inception in 1901, that's over one hundred years. I don't want to claim anyone else's work and/or words as my own and it's my eternal hope that others will reciprocate this basic and professional code of conduct.

Now that I've given credit where credit is due, I would like to state that while I learned this philosophy or approach to working on paint from Meguiar's, I've never seen anything else ever written on this topic either on paper or on the Internet explaining the idea behind the philosophy.

So let me share,
  • What it means
  • Why it's important
  • How to put this approach into practice


"Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"

The reasoning and logic behind this statement and approach towards working on car paint is for two reasons.
Reason 1 - Automotive paints are thin
Factory applied paint whether it came on a Model T or a brand new Ford Mustang is thin, very thin, thinner than most of us prefer. It's thin because it cost more to apply more paint in the way of materials, (the paint itself), and also time, as in the time it takes to spray the paint and allow flash time in-between each coating.

Time is money, so on an assembly line, or even in a body shop, more time means more money, for theses two reasons, cost of materials and time, paint is on a new car or paint from a body shop is thin.


Reason 2 - Removing below surface defects means removing a little paint
Below Surface Paint Defects are things like swirls, scratches, and etching like Type II Water Spots. Because these types of defects are below the surface level, that means they are "in" the paint, the only way to remove them is to abrade and remove a little of the surrounding paint until you level the upper most surface of the paint job until it's level with the lowest depths of the defects you're trying to remove.
In simple words... removing swirls, scratches and etching means removing a measured amount of paint.


Now let me tie the two concepts above together... follow me on this...

Paint is thin, removing defects means removing paint, there's not a lot of paint available to remove.

Starting to see the problem?


The top coat of paint on your car, no matter what type of paint system you have, (basecoat/clearcoat or single stage), is thin so you must keep this in mind anytime you're working on it or you let someone else work on it.


"Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"

Here's the "why" part…
The reason why you want to use the least aggressive product to get the job done is so that you'll leave the most amount of paint on the car to last over the service life of the car.


Make sense?

If you want to get deeper... this means that in order to use the least aggressive product to get the job done... you need to have more than one product in your arsenal of detailing supplies or how can you do any testing?

If you're a detailer, or a car owner that likes to take care of your own personal cars, then you need to have more than one paint correction product in your arsenal of detailing supplies.


Tool Time
Products are like tools, they enable you to perform a specific procedure or task that you couldn't do otherwise . Just like a screwdriver enables you to either remove or install a screw, a quality compound or polish enables you to remove defects and restore a show car finish.

You need some tools in your tool box!
If you haven't already, consider adding a few tools to your tool box so anytime you're working on a car's finish you'll already have the tools you need to do some testing and then tackle the job.

A well rounded inventory would include,
  • Aggressive Compound for serious paint defects
  • Medium Cut Polish
  • Light Cut Polish
  • Finishing Polish
  • Hand applied paint cleaner
  • Cleaner/Wax
  • Non abrasive glaze or pure polish

Where the rubber meets the road...
Putting the philosophy into practice means anytime you're going to work on your car or a customer's car, instead of diving right in head first with your most aggressive product, first test to see if something less aggressive will get the job done.

You see, paint systems are different, some paint systems are more polishable or workable than others but you'll never know until you do some testing.

I always tell my son this because it's true...

"You don't know what you can do until you try"

In the context of detailing, this means you don't know if you can remove the swirls with a light polish and a soft polishing pad until you try.

Sure you can remove them with an aggressive compound and cutting pad but if you're goal is to preserve your car's precious, thin coat of beauty, then start each project by doing some testing and try to find the least aggressive product in your detailing arsenal that will enable you to get the job done...


Mike.Phillips@Autogeek is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!twitter
Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 02:04 PM   #2
Director of Training
 
Mike.Phillips@Autogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stuart, Florida
Posts: 24,977
Re: "Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"

Related article here,

Factors that affect how aggressive or non-aggressive a product is...



Mike.Phillips@Autogeek is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!twitter
Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 11:43 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 80
Re: "Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"

Has anyone tried Meg’s DA micro fiber correcting system on non-factory paint?
How about Meg 105-205 on non-factory paint? If I wanted to use something a bit less abrasive on non-factory paint, what would I use? What about Wolfgang swirl remover? How abrasive is it in comparison to Meg’s DA or Megs 105-205? I will be using a DA. Thanks in advance!
chevchenko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!twitter
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 11:25 AM   #4
Member
 
robert1955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 68
Re: "Use the least aggressive product to get the job done"

Michael:

Did you have a chance to read my post on problems with take the remainder of Wolfgang swirl3.0 remover off the trunk of my wife's 300-E. Now the trunk and hood were repainted several weeks ago and I noticed the swirl marks from the buffers covered by the body shop glaze.
I followed your book instructions . I used a blue soft finish pad
which may of not been thee right pad . I primed the pad according to your book. made six pass up and down stopped my porter Cable DA on the trunk. then when to wife off the residue with a folded micro fiber cloth. This is were the problem occurred : the residue would not wipe easily off. ?
I proceeded with a clean Blue 6 inch pad same as before with the Wolfgang 3.0 Glaze this time not priming the pad as much. Again same problem. Waxed with wolfgang fusion had to take off by hand not DA.
What am I I doing wrong .. I read you book three times it your instructions should work. The orginal pain on the car I have no problems buffing but used a white pad single stage 040 Mercedes-Benz, trunk and hood two stage with clear.. Tell me what I did wron
Bob Geco
robert1955 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!twitter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Definitive How-To Article for Removing Swirls, Scratches and Water Spots Using a Porter Cable 7424XP, G110v2 or Griot's Garage Polisher Mike.Phillips@Autogeek Tricks, Tips and Techniques 45 04-20-2012 04:09 PM
The SMAT PACK - Everything you ever wanted to know about Meguiar's SMAT products... Mike.Phillips@Autogeek Hot topics and Frequently asked questions 33 09-07-2011 09:48 PM
Is 3M Performance Finish a Sealant? Kris R Auto Detailing 101 10 07-31-2010 07:45 AM
About to place an order. Need some help. Blake's Mobile Detailing Auto Detailing 101 10 01-28-2010 02:46 PM

» May 2012
S M T W T F S
2930 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 12
» Car Care Brands
Detailer's Pro Series Car Care Products
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©PBMA - Autogeekonline.net® All Rights Reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49